Conversation

Notices

  1. Rarity Rarity

    god bless http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2013/12/10/ntr.ntt203.short?rss=1

    Tuesday, 26-Aug-14 22:15:05 UTC from web
    1. Cerulean Spark Cerulean Spark

      @rarity So that does in fact justify banning e-cigs anywhere where smoking is already restricted.

      Tuesday, 26-Aug-14 22:16:27 UTC from web
      1. Rarity Rarity

        @cinnamonswirl that's not a bad thing, really. Obviously if an establishment doesn't want you to smoke/vape, you should respect that

        Tuesday, 26-Aug-14 22:17:28 UTC from web
        1. Cerulean Spark Cerulean Spark

          @rarity I have to deal with "E-cig extremists" lately for some reason (I guess because they own a chain of vape shops) who're convinced they're all harmless to all people at all times.

          Tuesday, 26-Aug-14 22:53:36 UTC from web
          1. Rarity Rarity

            @cinnamonswirl Well that's really dumb because Nicotine is obviously toxic in anything higher than small quantities

            Tuesday, 26-Aug-14 22:55:16 UTC from web
            1. Someone Probably Someone Probably

              @rarity the way I see it, whether it is harmful or not, if people don't want you vaping around them, it is rude to vape around them.

              Tuesday, 26-Aug-14 23:02:24 UTC from web
            2. Cerulean Spark Cerulean Spark

              @rarity The part that really upsets me is that this toolbox has gotten his own daughter, who /did not previously smoke/ hooked on nicotine containing e-cig liquid.

              Tuesday, 26-Aug-14 23:11:27 UTC from web