Conversation
Notices
-
@mrmattimation stop murdocking acting like you know ANYTHING about ANYTHING because you're just an uninformed IDIOT spouting off his mouth about anything controversial just to get a rise out of people and maybe a few shock laughs. just STOP.
Wednesday, 26-Nov-14 22:11:59 UTC from web-
@rarity I wasn't expecting to get a rise out of anybody because both you and Scribus blocked me and you two are like the only people who get mad at anything I say anymore.
-
@mrmattimation BS :L
-
@metaltao What? They actually blocked me and they actually are the only two people nowadays who have gotten really doleed at anything I say. If anybody else does, nobody has said anything. Why would I try to get a rise out of people who can't see what I'm saying in the first place? It'd be like yelling at a brick wall.
-
@mrmattimation It was in response to them being the only ones getting angry at you. I am personally, angry.
-
@metaltao Well then you shoulda said something, silly.
-
@mrmattimation Then, if I did, it would [probably get confused under the high emotions rnning on both sides, and, add fuel to a fire. I am not skilled enough to actually calm down a complex situation like this,/AND/ explain all of its details and discrepencies in one night.
-
@metaltao Genuinely all you have to say is, politely "I do not think that is funny, please stop." I'd have listened.
-
@mrmattimation I was not sure about that, considering I was not the first to have responded. Also the fact, I am not accustumed to urning peoples speech "on and off" like that by way of ask. I do know now thogh, thank you. But, basically, in a nut shell, it /was. what rarity said. But, of coutse she would get angry, and, having a rule where the response has to be /that/ specific sir, would mean that it will inevitably lead to an outrage. and, subesquent silence of another user who, can't control their emotions on a touchy subject matter like other people can. Basically, it was an accidental trap.
-