Conversation

Notices

  1. going through fzp and oh lord

    Sunday, 22-Jan-17 13:53:41 UTC from web
    1. @tiffany Still dealing with the pedos over there?

      Sunday, 22-Jan-17 13:54:08 UTC from web
      1. @nerthos i daren't go that far down the rabbit hole

        Sunday, 22-Jan-17 13:54:33 UTC from web
        1. @tiffany Oh. I thought that's what you were reacting to. Haven't checked there in a while but last time I did, they were trying to harass some pedos into leaving.

          Sunday, 22-Jan-17 13:56:16 UTC from web
          1. @nerthos i'm just on one account that's full of anti semitism

            Sunday, 22-Jan-17 14:00:05 UTC from web
          2. @nerthos @tiffany
            Eh... they can remain. As long as they don't break the one rule. It's the nature of the beast. You're going to find people talking about things you won't like, things that you'll find immoral.

            Sunday, 22-Jan-17 15:51:06 UTC from social.heldscal.la
            1. @sim I'm not saying they're not allowed to say stuff I dislike, but I will call it out accordingly

              Sunday, 22-Jan-17 15:51:02 UTC from web
              1. @tiffany
                That's the idea... you each have your own opinions, and can call each other out on them. But I was referencing my own thoughts about the whole harassment aspect of it. I'm not too keen on that, depending on what it means.

                Sunday, 22-Jan-17 15:55:26 UTC from social.heldscal.la
                1. @sim Fair

                  Sunday, 22-Jan-17 15:59:17 UTC from web
                  1. @tiffany
                    Of course, if it is simply arguing about the topics then I don't think that is harassment itself, and it is perfectly acceptable to do.

                    Sunday, 22-Jan-17 16:09:51 UTC from social.heldscal.la
                    1. @sim Over here discussing the topic wasn't allowed but that was mostly because at the time the site was supposed to be pg13

                      Sunday, 22-Jan-17 16:10:18 UTC from web
                      1. @nerthos
                        That is understandable. Different rules when that becomes the case.

                        Sunday, 22-Jan-17 16:13:58 UTC from social.heldscal.la
                    2. @sim I agree with that. I misunderstood what you were referring to before but I think we're on the same page

                      Sunday, 22-Jan-17 16:12:24 UTC from web
                      1. @tiffany
                        Yeah, I don't think we were not on the same page there. Well, unless you don't support free speech to the extent that I do, but I think you do.

                        Sunday, 22-Jan-17 16:15:27 UTC from social.heldscal.la
                        1. @sim I'd imagine so

                          Sunday, 22-Jan-17 16:15:22 UTC from web
            2. @sim Hey, we had one here too until he stepped out of line. They're not particulaly bad if they keep it to themselves.

              Sunday, 22-Jan-17 15:58:17 UTC from web
              1. @nerthos
                Yeah... I suppose it is like anything really. Like I said, as long as they don't post child porn then they can stay, if they do then we banhammer them. I suppose it is showing our commitment to free speech.

                Sunday, 22-Jan-17 16:08:23 UTC from social.heldscal.la
    2. @tiffany What did you find?

      Sunday, 22-Jan-17 13:57:39 UTC from gs.kawa-kun.com