{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Rainbow Dash Network","provider_url":"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/","type":"link","title":"Crusader 8 (princelypublictimeline)'s status on Friday, 10-Aug-12 15:08:44 UTC","author_name":"Crusader 8 (princelypublictimeline)","author_url":"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/princelypublictimeline","url":"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/notice\/1798805","html":"@<span class=\"vcard\"><a href=\"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/user\/7774\" class=\"url\" title=\"Casey Peak\"><span class=\"fn nickname\">masterspear<\/span><\/a><\/span> &quot;one article does not constitute the right to be cruel to others&quot; what you said there is exactly why I don't think you read the article, nor do I believe you understand what tolerance really is. Tolerating a person who exhibits harmful behavior and\/or discrimination\/hate is socially irresponsible. &quot;ah well ya see I'm tolerating the homophobe as a person but I'm not tolerating his hate.&quot; This makes no sense. the article isn't telling you it's okay to punch people that hate you; it's suggesting what responsible adults have known all along: Bad behavior shouldn't be tolerated, and the people behind hateful or harmful actions should be held responsible. See how I didn't jump from tolerance to cruelty? There are more ways to react to hate than tolerance or face-punching."}