{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Rainbow Dash Network","provider_url":"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/","type":"link","title":"Rarity (rarity)'s status on Wednesday, 09-Jul-14 16:01:45 UTC","author_name":"Rarity (rarity)","author_url":"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/rarity","url":"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/notice\/3516575","html":"@<span class=\"vcard\"><a href=\"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/user\/1975\" class=\"url\" title=\"Scoot\"><span class=\"fn nickname mention\">scoot<\/span><\/a><\/span> There's a difference between &quot;parody that uses all new source material&quot; (aka a video mocking a Toothpaste Mascot using a similar character) and &quot;parody that actually takes the source material&quot; (aka YouTube poops).  The first is what you're defending, but I'm talking about the second.  And the second is what I mean when I say that the material is legally the copyright owners possession."}