{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Rainbow Dash Network","provider_url":"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/","type":"link","title":"Narwhal (narwhal)'s status on Saturday, 28-Feb-15 03:22:55 UTC","author_name":"Narwhal (narwhal)","author_url":"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/narwhal","url":"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/notice\/3863788","html":"@<span class=\"vcard\"><a href=\"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/user\/8281\" class=\"url\"><span class=\"fn nickname mention\">loveydoe<\/span><\/a><\/span> It's because while our perception of the wavelength is qualitative the wavelength itself is quantitative. Like it or not, regardless of <i>how<\/i> we see the wavelength the wavelength itself can be measured and distinguished. Regardless of what you interpret, it's an objective fact that, as an example, a 620\u2013750 nm wavelength will produce a colour we refer to as &quot;red&quot;, regardless of what red is. The only presumptions I'm making are those grounded in reality that can be generally agreed upon, but you're right in that I didn't account for your outlandish solipsist perspective. I'm out."}