<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<oembed>
 <version>1.0</version>
 <type>link</type>
 <provider_name>Rainbow Dash Network</provider_name>
 <provider_url>http://rainbowdash.net/</provider_url>
 <title>Lumin Prometheus (luminosity)'s status on Wednesday, 28-Mar-12 11:55:39 UTC</title>
 <author_name>Lumin Prometheus (luminosity)</author_name>
 <author_url>http://rainbowdash.net/luminosity</author_url>
 <url>http://rainbowdash.net/notice/1130008</url>
 <html>@&lt;span class=&quot;vcard&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://rainbowdash.net/user/4320&quot; class=&quot;url&quot; title=&quot;Nerthos Nyaa&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fn nickname&quot;&gt;nerthos&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Then you should not of compared a weapon which takes an obvious amount mastery to use and compared it to a long sword. A whip is a practical weapon or it would not be classified as a weapon. In a scenario where both weilders help the same mastery there is no telling what would happen. You cannot assume that a sword would win just like I cannot assume a whip would win. The situation is far fetched because we live in a modern time with much better weapons. I am sure that any battle where a long sword fought a guy with a whip is long lost or is undocumented. I am just saying that a whip is a practical weapon.</html>
</oembed>
