<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<oembed>
 <version>1.0</version>
 <type>link</type>
 <provider_name>Rainbow Dash Network</provider_name>
 <provider_url>http://rainbowdash.net/</provider_url>
 <title>Crusader 8 (princelypublictimeline)'s status on Friday, 10-Aug-12 15:08:44 UTC</title>
 <author_name>Crusader 8 (princelypublictimeline)</author_name>
 <author_url>http://rainbowdash.net/princelypublictimeline</author_url>
 <url>http://rainbowdash.net/notice/1798805</url>
 <html>@&lt;span class=&quot;vcard&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://rainbowdash.net/user/7774&quot; class=&quot;url&quot; title=&quot;Casey Peak&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fn nickname&quot;&gt;masterspear&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &amp;quot;one article does not constitute the right to be cruel to others&amp;quot; what you said there is exactly why I don't think you read the article, nor do I believe you understand what tolerance really is. Tolerating a person who exhibits harmful behavior and/or discrimination/hate is socially irresponsible. &amp;quot;ah well ya see I'm tolerating the homophobe as a person but I'm not tolerating his hate.&amp;quot; This makes no sense. the article isn't telling you it's okay to punch people that hate you; it's suggesting what responsible adults have known all along: Bad behavior shouldn't be tolerated, and the people behind hateful or harmful actions should be held responsible. See how I didn't jump from tolerance to cruelty? There are more ways to react to hate than tolerance or face-punching.</html>
</oembed>
