<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<oembed>
 <version>1.0</version>
 <type>link</type>
 <provider_name>Rainbow Dash Network</provider_name>
 <provider_url>http://rainbowdash.net/</provider_url>
 <title>Cloud Kicker (critialcloudkicker)'s status on Wednesday, 01-Jan-14 19:51:08 UTC</title>
 <author_name>Cloud Kicker (critialcloudkicker)</author_name>
 <author_url>http://rainbowdash.net/critialcloudkicker</author_url>
 <url>http://rainbowdash.net/notice/3222317</url>
 <html>@&lt;span class=&quot;vcard&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://rainbowdash.net/user/21008&quot; class=&quot;url&quot; title=&quot;Jamie&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fn nickname mention&quot;&gt;jamster&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; No, the I5-4670K because it is 53% faster in single threaded applications. and because it has AVX2 instructions ( Which I guess will be really neat in the future ) . And the power consumption is WAY lower ( per core ? ). However I would simply LOVE to put them side by side to see how it functions :) ... I am going to get my hands on that i5-4670K computer somewhere before the 2nd week of 2014 and have to install Windows 7 on it for my brother ( who bought the PC, technically )</html>
</oembed>
