<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<oembed>
 <version>1.0</version>
 <type>link</type>
 <provider_name>Rainbow Dash Network</provider_name>
 <provider_url>http://rainbowdash.net/</provider_url>
 <title>caret7's status on Tuesday, 08-Jul-14 02:31:30 UTC</title>
 <author_name>caret7</author_name>
 <author_url>http://rainbowdash.net/caret7</author_url>
 <url>http://rainbowdash.net/notice/3512661</url>
 <html>@&lt;span class=&quot;vcard&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://rainbowdash.net/user/8281&quot; class=&quot;url&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fn nickname mention&quot;&gt;loveydoe&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Deviation may not necessarily be wrong or destructive, but it also is not necessarily right or constructive. Not that you were saying that; this is just for completeness's sake. Whether someting can be qualified as &amp;quot;destructive&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;constructive&amp;quot; is a tricky business, in its own right. The collapse (destruction) of a building results in (constructs) a pile of rubble. You can build (construct) something new with that rubble, but in so doing you remove (destruct) the pile of rubble, which could have been a nice home for certain critters. So depending on how you look at it, construction and destruction go hand-in-hand.</html>
</oembed>
