<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<oembed>
 <version>1.0</version>
 <type>link</type>
 <provider_name>Rainbow Dash Network</provider_name>
 <provider_url>http://rainbowdash.net/</provider_url>
 <title>RedEnchilada (notice the lack of a space) (redenchilada)'s status on Wednesday, 24-Feb-16 14:44:39 UTC</title>
 <author_name>RedEnchilada (notice the lack of a space) (redenchilada)</author_name>
 <author_url>http://rainbowdash.net/redenchilada</author_url>
 <url>http://rainbowdash.net/notice/4091163</url>
 <html>@&lt;span class=&quot;vcard&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://quitter.se/taknamay&quot; class=&quot;url&quot; title=&quot;taknamay&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fn nickname mention&quot;&gt;taknamay&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; I'm not getting a good argument from this. Just some quotes about Nazis and calling copyright fascist? Don't get me wrong, I like open source, but it's something that only really works on an opt-in basis. Otherwise you lose a lot of incentive for commercial business to enter the field, which contributes a lot more to its growth than you'd think. Just because development of software, media, etc doesn't lead to a physical product doesn't mean it has to be public domain, although I do agree users should be able to use things in a personal setting however they please. Also, if something like my employer's website was open source, you'd be exposing a lot of confidential medical information and violating the hell out of HIPAA, just to give an example. There are a lot of cases like that where some control of software is necessary.</html>
</oembed>
