<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<oembed>
 <version>1.0</version>
 <type>link</type>
 <provider_name>Rainbow Dash Network</provider_name>
 <provider_url>http://rainbowdash.net/</provider_url>
 <title>Scribus (scribus)'s status on Sunday, 05-Jun-16 04:21:03 UTC</title>
 <author_name>Scribus (scribus)</author_name>
 <author_url>http://rainbowdash.net/scribus</author_url>
 <url>http://rainbowdash.net/notice/4206456</url>
 <html>@&lt;span class=&quot;vcard&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://rainbowdash.net/user/1766&quot; class=&quot;url&quot; title=&quot;Zenneth Ryver-Styx&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fn nickname mention&quot;&gt;zennx&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; People have argued that even labeling &amp;quot;troublesome&amp;quot; content can be a problem and cause de facto censorship by restricting potential audience. I agree, in that making anything same sex a rating level higher (like when Ellen came out), or keeping &amp;quot;alternative&amp;quot; political viewpoints in a restricted access library, would be stealth or light censorship. But saying, &amp;quot;Hey, this is a thing, do or don't, it's your call,&amp;quot; and then still along it openly available (as most trigger warnings are done), that isn't censorship, it's basically just ratings or classification. I'm certain there's a point where the line blurs, but TW isn't it.</html>
</oembed>
