Replies to rarity, page 239
-
@rarity i like this one http://www.giantmicrobes.com/us/products/penicillin.html
-
@rarity They are pretty much all terrifying
-
@rarity MY FIRST THOUGHT WAS: IT LOOKS KINDA LIKE A FURBY
-
@rarity The human race boldly laughs at what the Gods throw down to knock them down a peg.
-
@rarity So someone who is supposed to know cherries did some stupid dole... That's great >_<
-
@rarity Wait, that has happned ?
-
@rarity True, but Diction is for text. Tone can still be implied through use of Emoticons, which, is what they were used for, to denote meaning and also, some essential nonverbal to a purely textual medium. :L
-
@rarity You do not have to hold your tongue, there are a lot of words and phrases. One merely has to word them. :D But, alright. If you say so. :P There is DICTION in words, it is what we were taught in English class. Use it wisely my friend!
-
@rarity You defined in the last post there are "Real" feminists and those who only call themselves feminists. Which, is not so much true in this definition where one only has to end up calling themselves that. I understand they don't ma'am but, they can lead to anger and, even violence. A turning point away from truth for just wanting to "Win" at something. I am merely trying to point out that you made a mistake and you should rephrase that to better argue a point to me, to fix your argument. If you will.
-
@rarity Which, there is sadly, no real standard definiton of, that you used is a fallacy, a no real scots man fallacy... There are bad apples.
-
@rarity I have used the term to divide it into one group being Feminists, and the other, feminazis... You know, there are extremes to either side, and, there is sadly no standard definition of what is or isn't a Feminist. It sucks that we can't standardize this apples. Like, a lexicographer. I don't know, I will stop. It coould easily be taken out of context for all I guess.
-
@rarity but it is so obvious
-
@rarity they are 30% horse
