Replies to rarity, page 244

  1. @rarity I have my license but probably won't be buying myself a car for a while

    Friday, 17-Oct-14 03:47:34 UTC from web in context
  2. @rarity aw man... balljoints.

    Friday, 17-Oct-14 03:47:28 UTC from web in context
  3. @rarity I am a bit jelly right now. A bit of butter in it as well.

    Friday, 17-Oct-14 03:46:56 UTC from web in context
  4. @rarity I thought you were looking at a Pontiac? Granted that was some while ago.

    Friday, 17-Oct-14 03:46:37 UTC from web in context
  5. @rarity How many times does he even say Versace in that song?

    Thursday, 16-Oct-14 01:37:40 UTC from web in context
  6. @rarity spoiler: they go only to Rio and São Paulo

    Thursday, 16-Oct-14 01:32:25 UTC from web in context
  7. @rarity True, but, then you can classify it as any age. And still be called correct in that assumption. Basically, it is impossible to know what age, but the age must exists, unless the universe depicted does not have anything that we know as age as we know it. There for, making it ok here, as it completely bypasses the law by eliminating age from all objcts and characters in the scene that can be used to then estimate the age of the subject.

    Thursday, 16-Oct-14 01:26:46 UTC from web in context
  8. @rarity I dunno, the whole thing makes me really squeamish. I feel like it encourages pedophilia or whatever, which is probably dumb coming from someone who tries to advocate a "do whatever you want as long as it's legal" mentality.

    Thursday, 16-Oct-14 01:25:08 UTC from web in context
  9. @rarity That's stupid. The ageless part, I mean.

    Thursday, 16-Oct-14 01:20:49 UTC from web in context
  10. @rarity Yeah. I removed it before no more than two people had actually been able to access it, though.

    Thursday, 16-Oct-14 01:19:36 UTC from web in context
  11. @rarity Granted, he had the tag Spoilers but it was the wrong tag.

    Thursday, 16-Oct-14 01:18:21 UTC from web in context
  12. @rarity Yeah, my blog that has all of my art on it.

    Thursday, 16-Oct-14 01:18:21 UTC from web in context
  13. @rarity yeah

    Thursday, 16-Oct-14 01:18:13 UTC from web in context
  14. @rarity Yes.

    Thursday, 16-Oct-14 01:18:00 UTC from web in context
  15. @rarity u gon die m7

    Wednesday, 15-Oct-14 03:32:11 UTC from web in context
  16. @rarity give me back my propanol

    Wednesday, 15-Oct-14 03:29:53 UTC from web in context
  17. @rarity p diddy day care

    Wednesday, 15-Oct-14 03:27:24 UTC from web in context
  18. @rarity Okay, last thing. I had a genuine curiosity in the 1992 LA Riots so I decided to look it up as well as RK. I was simply posting my findings like I would any other topic, nothing more.

    Wednesday, 15-Oct-14 01:53:56 UTC from web in context
  19. @rarity Well I'm not sleepin tonight

    Wednesday, 15-Oct-14 01:49:32 UTC from web in context
  20. @rarity Wha???????????????AAAAAAAAAAAA

    Wednesday, 15-Oct-14 01:46:46 UTC from web in context
  21. @rarity no

    Wednesday, 15-Oct-14 01:46:10 UTC from web in context
  22. @rarity Maybe so, but I refuse to hold back a criticism just because bad people might use that to say bad things. I'm sorry if you were offended by what I'm saying but I genuinely don't think anything I'm saying is inherently wrong, and yelling at/calling me a racist isn't really going to accomplish much.

    Wednesday, 15-Oct-14 01:45:42 UTC from web in context
  23. @rarity I appreciate that you took the time to explain this to me. Thank you. However, like I said before, none of what I am saying is at all influenced by race. Whether or not King is famous because he was beaten as a result of his race is a different story, because I do genuinely think race had a lot to do with it. But right here, what I am saying right now about him, negative or positive, is in no way influenced by his race.

    Wednesday, 15-Oct-14 01:39:45 UTC from web in context
  24. @rarity You are correct about that, please explain it to me because I sincerely have no idea.

    Wednesday, 15-Oct-14 01:28:57 UTC from web in context
  25. @rarity None of what I said was based on race whatsoever so I dunno why you're pulling that card on me.

    Wednesday, 15-Oct-14 01:24:28 UTC from web in context
  26. @rarity You know, it's possible to disagree with someone's opinion without getting REALLY insanely kiwied off about it. I wasn't attacking you, so why are you attacking me? I didn't say he deserved to get the crap kicked out of him, I just said he was a really bad person. You need to calm down, seriously, none of what I said was hostile to anybody here in any way so responding with hostility is pretty inappropriate.

    Wednesday, 15-Oct-14 01:20:24 UTC from web in context
  27. @rarity you couldn't have just used the word filter?

    Tuesday, 14-Oct-14 02:45:48 UTC from web in context
  28. @rarity Daaaank....

    Tuesday, 14-Oct-14 02:43:20 UTC from web in context
  29. @rarity Yeah, I think it may have been a bait-and-switch window display, though, so....

    Tuesday, 14-Oct-14 02:35:12 UTC from web in context
  30. @rarity Well, according to "Species" from 1995 you can get a wedding dress for $39.95 so....

    Tuesday, 14-Oct-14 02:34:15 UTC from web in context