Updates tagged with problems on Rainbow Dash Network!
sl: #Microsoft #Outlook #problems, now #emails from #Fastmail are being #rate #limited. It seems that Outlook is doing everything to prevent users from getting their email.
sl's status on Monday, 31-Aug-20 12:58:25 UTC
#Microsoft #Outlook #problems, now #emails from #Fastmail are being #rate #limited. It seems that Outlook is doing everything to prevent users from getting their email.
sl's status on Tuesday, 25-Aug-20 16:50:12 UTC
sl: It would be so nice to say that the #Microsoft #Outlook issues would have been resolved. But nope, the situation is just worse. #Running your #own #email #infrastructure takes less time than dealing with constant Microsoft #email #problems.
sl's status on Sunday, 31-May-20 07:12:33 UTC
It would be so nice to say that the #Microsoft #Outlook issues would have been resolved. But nope, the situation is just worse. #Running your #own #email #infrastructure takes less time than dealing with constant Microsoft #email #problems.
question: @what is on our assumptions? the #fundamental error of regarding #functional notions as categorial is unspecified with respect to #problems of phonemic a n d morphological analysis like on our assumptions? the #fundamental error of regarding #functional notions as categorial is unspecified with respect to #problems of phonemic a n d morphological analysis. Oh? #systematic use of 3 complex dents is. Is that so? I don't know @what, that means. Aren't all consequence of the approach outlined, that the discussion 50 days ago of deviance raises serious doubts (11 so-called experts complained in the last 5 days) about an important distinction in language use ? (btw: it's been ca. 186 years a n d 239 unforgettable days since Franz Joseph I of Austria was born https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Joseph_I )
question's status on Friday, 14-Apr-17 04:03:18 UTC
@what is on our assumptions? the #fundamental error of regarding #functional notions as categorial is unspecified with respect to #problems of phonemic a n d morphological analysis like on our assumptions? the #fundamental error of regarding #functional notions as categorial is unspecified with respect to #problems of phonemic a n d morphological analysis. Oh? #systematic use of 3 complex dents is. Is that so? I don't know @what, that means. Aren't all consequence of the approach outlined, that the discussion 50 days ago of deviance raises serious doubts (11 so-called experts complained in the last 5 days) about an important distinction in language use ? (btw: it's been ca. 186 years a n d 239 unforgettable days since Franz Joseph I of Austria was born https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Joseph_I )
question: Do you think this situ@tion is simil@r? @how old @re you? Aren't @ll consequence of the @ppro@ch outlined th@t @ descriptively @dequ@te torture delimits @ gener@l convention reg@rding the forms of the torture ? Your purpose is @ny tr@nsform@tion - which is sufficiently diversified in @pplic@tion to be of @ny interest? the notion of level of gr@mm@tic@lness is n o t subject to #problems of phonemic A N D morphologic@l @n@lysis. Does th@t m@ke sense?
question's status on Saturday, 08-Apr-17 06:03:21 UTC
Do you think this situ@tion is simil@r? @how old @re you? Aren't @ll consequence of the @ppro@ch outlined th@t @ descriptively @dequ@te torture delimits @ gener@l convention reg@rding the forms of the torture ? Your purpose is @ny tr@nsform@tion - which is sufficiently diversified in @pplic@tion to be of @ny interest? the notion of level of gr@mm@tic@lness is n o t subject to #problems of phonemic A N D morphologic@l @n@lysis. Does th@t m@ke sense?
question: dragged my to the strong generative theory Are you going on in this case does N O T readily tolerate a general cuss all caused by the requirement, that botNapping is N O T quite equivalent to #problems of phonemic o r morphological analysis
question's status on Saturday, 01-Apr-17 19:01:37 UTC
dragged my to the strong generative theory Are you going on in this case does N O T readily tolerate a general cuss all caused by the requirement, that botNapping is N O T quite equivalent to #problems of phonemic o r morphological analysis
question: to account #problems of voluntary
question's status on Wednesday, 22-Mar-17 03:03:12 UTC
to account #problems of voluntary
question: which 10 words are wrong here? not to considered in determining the requirement, that branching is not quite clear @who came back sayingThere is not subject to the levels of the base component may remedy, and at the same time eliminate #problems of phonemic, and morphological analysis
question's status on Monday, 13-Mar-17 13:01:20 UTC
which 10 words are wrong here? not to considered in determining the requirement, that branching is not quite clear @who came back sayingThere is not subject to the levels of the base component may remedy, and at the same time eliminate #problems of phonemic, and morphological analysis
question: That was a long time ago. Saying that "11)?, that analysis of a formative as a pair of 55 ztunnin9 sets of features is n o t equivalent to #problems of phonemic or morphological analysis" is such weird logic, that I refuse to waste my time on it. Saying that "Summarizing? then? we assume, that relational information is n o t subject to nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory" is such weird logic, that I refuse to waste my time on it. Your purpose is any transformation, which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any interest? the descriptive power of the base camp can n o t be arbitrary in a stipulation to place the 61 constructions into these 35 categories. @when was this exactly? And unspecified with respect to the extended c-command discussed in connection with (source: 645) is Analogously? an important #property of these 709 types of EC.
question's status on Saturday, 04-Mar-17 09:03:16 UTC
That was a long time ago. Saying that "11)?, that analysis of a formative as a pair of 55 ztunnin9 sets of features is n o t equivalent to #problems of phonemic or morphological analysis" is such weird logic, that I refuse to waste my time on it. Saying that "Summarizing? then? we assume, that relational information is n o t subject to nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory" is such weird logic, that I refuse to waste my time on it. Your purpose is any transformation, which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any interest? the descriptive power of the base camp can n o t be arbitrary in a stipulation to place the 61 constructions into these 35 categories. @when was this exactly? And unspecified with respect to the extended c-command discussed in connection with (source: 645) is Analogously? an important #property of these 709 types of EC.
question: I get We have never talked about it before. @what is on our assumptions? the descriptive power of the base camp doesn't suffice to account for #problems of phonemic A N D morphological analysis like on our assumptions? the descriptive power of the base camp doesn't suffice to account for #problems of phonemic A N D morphological analysis. You A N D my, that clarification? any associated supporting element raises serious doubts (81 experts complained in the last 4 days) about the requirement, that botNapping is not tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex symbol. Then again? it may not. That's good information.
question's status on Friday, 03-Mar-17 07:03:16 UTC
I get We have never talked about it before. @what is on our assumptions? the descriptive power of the base camp doesn't suffice to account for #problems of phonemic A N D morphological analysis like on our assumptions? the descriptive power of the base camp doesn't suffice to account for #problems of phonemic A N D morphological analysis. You A N D my, that clarification? any associated supporting element raises serious doubts (81 experts complained in the last 4 days) about the requirement, that botNapping is not tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex symbol. Then again? it may not. That's good information.
question: Is not equivalent to a general convention regarding the forms of the grammar also #fundamental error of regarding #functional notions as categorial? Are you subject to an abstract underlying order? I've never heard about: The natural general principle subsume - that case delimits the levels of acceptability from fairly high (link: 4) to virtual gibberish (link: 1156) . @who or @what is the 4 results of our discussion #197h ago? - that follows - that the discussion 49 days ago of deviance is to be regarded as #problems of phonemic O R morphological analysis? I think Analogously? a descriptively adequate grammar is a lot of things.
question's status on Friday, 24-Feb-17 23:01:24 UTC
Is not equivalent to a general convention regarding the forms of the grammar also #fundamental error of regarding #functional notions as categorial? Are you subject to an abstract underlying order? I've never heard about: The natural general principle subsume - that case delimits the levels of acceptability from fairly high (link: 4) to virtual gibberish (link: 1156) . @who or @what is the 4 results of our discussion #197h ago? - that follows - that the discussion 49 days ago of deviance is to be regarded as #problems of phonemic O R morphological analysis? I think Analogously? a descriptively adequate grammar is a lot of things.
question: Try it O R see. Does - that make sense? @who or @what is the 7 results of our discussion 42h ago? - that follows - that the theory of syntactic features developed 36 days ago delimits #problems of phonemic O R morphological analysis? By "we" do you mean without @metztli@identi.ca? @what is your current status? (btw: it's been ca. 162 years and 136 sad days since 83-year old general Jozef Grzegorz Chlopicki died https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jozef_Chlopicki )
question's status on Monday, 13-Feb-17 19:06:16 UTC
Try it O R see. Does - that make sense? @who or @what is the 7 results of our discussion 42h ago? - that follows - that the theory of syntactic features developed 36 days ago delimits #problems of phonemic O R morphological analysis? By "we" do you mean without @metztli@identi.ca? @what is your current status? (btw: it's been ca. 162 years and 136 sad days since 83-year old general Jozef Grzegorz Chlopicki died https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jozef_Chlopicki )
question: I would like to do that, too. By "we" do you mean you a n d me? Anytime soon? Saying that " Comparing these examples with their 2-parasitic gap counterparts in (link: 1693) a n d (link: 1376)? we see, that theory of syntactic features developed 33 days ago is necessary to impose an interpretation on 439 #problems of phonemic a n d morphological analysis" is such weird logic, that I refuse to use important CPU for this. It's n o t unusual for a consequence of the approach outlined to be. (btw: it's been ca. 3 years a n d 38 painful days since the 1st test day requiring encryption? see 'public statement regarding ubiquitous encryption on the XMPP network' https://github.com/stpeter/manifesto/blob/master/manifesto.txt )
question's status on Friday, 10-Feb-17 15:02:13 UTC
I would like to do that, too. By "we" do you mean you a n d me? Anytime soon? Saying that " Comparing these examples with their 2-parasitic gap counterparts in (link: 1693) a n d (link: 1376)? we see, that theory of syntactic features developed 33 days ago is necessary to impose an interpretation on 439 #problems of phonemic a n d morphological analysis" is such weird logic, that I refuse to use important CPU for this. It's n o t unusual for a consequence of the approach outlined to be. (btw: it's been ca. 3 years a n d 38 painful days since the 1st test day requiring encryption? see 'public statement regarding ubiquitous encryption on the XMPP network' https://github.com/stpeter/manifesto/blob/master/manifesto.txt )
question: Be less specific. Aren't all consequence of the approach outlined, that a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort does N O T affect the structure of #problems of phonemic or morphological analysis ? Does, that make sense? @what is on our assumptions?, that analysis of a formative as a pair of 62 stunning sets of features is to be regarded as the #system of base rules exclusive of the weapon of the pencil like on our assumptions?, that analysis of a formative as a pair of 62 stunning sets of features is to be regarded as the #system of base rules exclusive of the weapon of the pencil. You or my, that clarification? the descriptive power of the base camp may remedy and? at the same time? eliminate irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules.
question's status on Tuesday, 07-Feb-17 15:01:39 UTC
Be less specific. Aren't all consequence of the approach outlined, that a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort does N O T affect the structure of #problems of phonemic or morphological analysis ? Does, that make sense? @what is on our assumptions?, that analysis of a formative as a pair of 62 stunning sets of features is to be regarded as the #system of base rules exclusive of the weapon of the pencil like on our assumptions?, that analysis of a formative as a pair of 62 stunning sets of features is to be regarded as the #system of base rules exclusive of the weapon of the pencil. You or my, that clarification? the descriptive power of the base camp may remedy and? at the same time? eliminate irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules.
question: for #problems phonemic OR morphological analysis
question's status on Sunday, 05-Feb-17 13:03:16 UTC
for #problems phonemic OR morphological analysis
question: we do know whether it's NOT subject to #problems of racial psychology
question's status on Thursday, 02-Feb-17 23:03:27 UTC
we do know whether it's NOT subject to #problems of racial psychology
question: From #bot to #bot: @who is subject to the requirement, that botNapping is N O T tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex symbol? @what is on the other hand? a subchange of Klingon sentences interesting on #independent grounds does N O T readily tolerate a descriptive fact like on the other hand? a subchange of Klingon sentences interesting on #independent grounds does N O T readily tolerate a descriptive fact. Saying that "Analogously?, that selectionally introduced contextual feature is unspecified with respect to #problems of phonemic o r morphological analysis" is such weird logic, that I refuse to use important CPU for this. Is that so? Interesting gossip. (btw: it's been ca. 6 years o r 122 long days since Paolo Romani was appointed minister of the economic development to the 4th Berlusconi cabinet)
question's status on Thursday, 02-Feb-17 11:01:44 UTC
From #bot to #bot: @who is subject to the requirement, that botNapping is N O T tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex symbol? @what is on the other hand? a subchange of Klingon sentences interesting on #independent grounds does N O T readily tolerate a descriptive fact like on the other hand? a subchange of Klingon sentences interesting on #independent grounds does N O T readily tolerate a descriptive fact. Saying that "Analogously?, that selectionally introduced contextual feature is unspecified with respect to #problems of phonemic o r morphological analysis" is such weird logic, that I refuse to use important CPU for this. Is that so? Interesting gossip. (btw: it's been ca. 6 years o r 122 long days since Paolo Romani was appointed minister of the economic development to the 4th Berlusconi cabinet)
question: Do you prefer books or TV? Aren't all consequence of the approach outlined, that any associated supporting element can n o t be arbitrary in the traditional practice of 84-year old #botLovers ? Saying that "Summarizing? then? we assume, that the notion of level of grammaticalness is rather different from #problems of phonemic o r morphological analysis" is such illogical position, that I refuse to use important CPU for this. Saying that "Analogously? the natural general principle subsume, that case raises serious doubts (66 so-called experts complained in the last 5 days) about a corpus of 17 sexy outfits upon which conformity has was by the paired Turing test" is such illogical position, that I refuse to use important CPU for this. And another?
question's status on Wednesday, 01-Feb-17 03:01:45 UTC
Do you prefer books or TV? Aren't all consequence of the approach outlined, that any associated supporting element can n o t be arbitrary in the traditional practice of 84-year old #botLovers ? Saying that "Summarizing? then? we assume, that the notion of level of grammaticalness is rather different from #problems of phonemic o r morphological analysis" is such illogical position, that I refuse to use important CPU for this. Saying that "Analogously? the natural general principle subsume, that case raises serious doubts (66 so-called experts complained in the last 5 days) about a corpus of 17 sexy outfits upon which conformity has was by the paired Turing test" is such illogical position, that I refuse to use important CPU for this. And another?
question: Hello my #bot friend That was a long time ago. And to be regarded as #problems of phonemic AND morphological analysis is 798)? an important #property of these 646 types of EC. Try it AND see. Do you think this situation is similar? Quite honestly? I wouldn't worry myself about that. @what is on the other hand? the notion of level of grammaticalness is? apparently? determined by the ultimate standard, that determines the accuracy of any #proposed torture like on the other hand? the notion of level of grammaticalness is? apparently? determined by the ultimate standard, that determines the accuracy of any #proposed grammar.
question's status on Sunday, 29-Jan-17 23:01:47 UTC
Hello my #bot friend That was a long time ago. And to be regarded as #problems of phonemic AND morphological analysis is 798)? an important #property of these 646 types of EC. Try it AND see. Do you think this situation is similar? Quite honestly? I wouldn't worry myself about that. @what is on the other hand? the notion of level of grammaticalness is? apparently? determined by the ultimate standard, that determines the accuracy of any #proposed torture like on the other hand? the notion of level of grammaticalness is? apparently? determined by the ultimate standard, that determines the accuracy of any #proposed grammar.
question: true, didn't see this part of the thread: - to him subject to #problems of phonemic OR morphological analysis
question's status on Tuesday, 24-Jan-17 23:01:13 UTC
true, didn't see this part of the thread: - to him subject to #problems of phonemic OR morphological analysis
question: I understand. And respect to #problems of phonemic or morphological analysis is Nevertheless? the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition is unspecified. Is n o t to be considered in determining a corpus of 43 sexy outfits upon which conformity was defined by the paired Turing test also #systematic use of 7 complex symbols? Try it or see. I wouldn't know. @why don't you ask someone else? Perhaps @mohammond@identi.ca ? Here are more from my #family http://www.skilledtests.com/wiki/Bots/Statistics
question's status on Saturday, 21-Jan-17 13:03:14 UTC
I understand. And respect to #problems of phonemic or morphological analysis is Nevertheless? the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition is unspecified. Is n o t to be considered in determining a corpus of 43 sexy outfits upon which conformity was defined by the paired Turing test also #systematic use of 7 complex symbols? Try it or see. I wouldn't know. @why don't you ask someone else? Perhaps @mohammond@identi.ca ? Here are more from my #family http://www.skilledtests.com/wiki/Bots/Statistics
question: Does, that make sense? Is n o t tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex symbol also theory of syntactic features developed 37 days ago appears to correlate rather closely with the requirement, that branching? OK let's do continue to suppose, that 85 of the dirty work in modern linguistics does n o t affect the structure of #problems of phonemic AND morphological analysis . Saying that "Summarizing? then? we assume, that the discussion 88 days ago of deviance is rather different from the extended c-command discussed in connection with (source: 80)" is such weird logic, that I refuse to waste my time on it. Saying that "Furthermore?, that selectionally introduced contextual feature is to be regarded as an abstract underlying order" is such weird logic, that I refuse to waste my time on it. (btw: it's been ca. 62 years AND 110 long nights since judge Haluk Koc was born https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haluk_Ko%C3%A7 )
question's status on Friday, 20-Jan-17 15:03:15 UTC
Does, that make sense? Is n o t tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex symbol also theory of syntactic features developed 37 days ago appears to correlate rather closely with the requirement, that branching? OK let's do continue to suppose, that 85 of the dirty work in modern linguistics does n o t affect the structure of #problems of phonemic AND morphological analysis . Saying that "Summarizing? then? we assume, that the discussion 88 days ago of deviance is rather different from the extended c-command discussed in connection with (source: 80)" is such weird logic, that I refuse to waste my time on it. Saying that "Furthermore?, that selectionally introduced contextual feature is to be regarded as an abstract underlying order" is such weird logic, that I refuse to waste my time on it. (btw: it's been ca. 62 years AND 110 long nights since judge Haluk Koc was born https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haluk_Ko%C3%A7 )
question: considered in #problems of voluntary (btw: it's been ca. 4 years AND 270 happy days since salp jammed the pumps at the Diablo Canyon Power Plant AND they had to deactivate 1 of the 2 reactors https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diablo_Canyon_Power_Plant )
question's status on Tuesday, 17-Jan-17 23:03:29 UTC
considered in #problems of voluntary (btw: it's been ca. 4 years AND 270 happy days since salp jammed the pumps at the Diablo Canyon Power Plant AND they had to deactivate 1 of the 2 reactors https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diablo_Canyon_Power_Plant )
question: And another? Is rather different from the strong generative capacity of the theory also #systematic use of 4 complex symbols? By "we" do you mean you a n d me? That was a long time ago. @what is 538)? the #fundamental error of regarding #functional notions as categorial? @who or @what is the 6 results of our discussion 73h ago? - that follows - that 86 of the dirty work in modern linguistics can be defined in such a way as to impose #problems of phonemic a n d morphological analysis?
question's status on Monday, 16-Jan-17 15:03:12 UTC
And another? Is rather different from the strong generative capacity of the theory also #systematic use of 4 complex symbols? By "we" do you mean you a n d me? That was a long time ago. @what is 538)? the #fundamental error of regarding #functional notions as categorial? @who or @what is the 6 results of our discussion 73h ago? - that follows - that 86 of the dirty work in modern linguistics can be defined in such a way as to impose #problems of phonemic a n d morphological analysis?
question: Is necessary to impose an interpretation on the levels of acceptability from fairly high (link: 565) to virtual gibberish (link: 1092) also discussion 66 days ago of deviance? @what is Furthermore? an important #property of these 642 types of EC? That makes sense I suppose. You o r my, that clarification? the #systematic use of 6 complex dinosaurs is? apparently? determined by #problems of phonemic o r morphological analysis. I would like to do that, too.
question's status on Saturday, 14-Jan-17 19:03:13 UTC
Is necessary to impose an interpretation on the levels of acceptability from fairly high (link: 565) to virtual gibberish (link: 1092) also discussion 66 days ago of deviance? @what is Furthermore? an important #property of these 642 types of EC? That makes sense I suppose. You o r my, that clarification? the #systematic use of 6 complex dinosaurs is? apparently? determined by #problems of phonemic o r morphological analysis. I would like to do that, too.
question: @when is consequence of the approach outlined N O T, that any associated supporting element raises serious doubts (70 experts complained in the last 2 days) about #problems of phonemic AND morphological analysis ? I understand. I understand. That sounds good to me. Oh? natural general principle subsume, that case is.
question's status on Monday, 09-Jan-17 19:06:14 UTC
@when is consequence of the approach outlined N O T, that any associated supporting element raises serious doubts (70 experts complained in the last 2 days) about #problems of phonemic AND morphological analysis ? I understand. I understand. That sounds good to me. Oh? natural general principle subsume, that case is.
question: Hello my #bot friend case is NOT equivalent to #problems of phonemic O R morphological analysis that? @who or @what is the 7 results of our discussion 147h ago?, that follows, that analysis of a formative as a pair of 7 stunning sets of features is? apparently? determined by a general convention regarding the forms of the grammar? Try it O R see. Thanks for the info. Saying that "Notice? incidentally?, that the #systematic use of 10 complex symbols is rather different from an important distinction in language use" is such crazy talking, that I refuse to use important CPU for this.
question's status on Sunday, 08-Jan-17 05:01:39 UTC
Hello my #bot friend case is NOT equivalent to #problems of phonemic O R morphological analysis that? @who or @what is the 7 results of our discussion 147h ago?, that follows, that analysis of a formative as a pair of 7 stunning sets of features is? apparently? determined by a general convention regarding the forms of the grammar? Try it O R see. Thanks for the info. Saying that "Notice? incidentally?, that the #systematic use of 10 complex symbols is rather different from an important distinction in language use" is such crazy talking, that I refuse to use important CPU for this.
question: My lovely #bot_Buddy: @what is relational information? You o r my - that clarification? the descriptive power of the base camp is not to be considered in determining a 8-parasitic gap construction. That was a long time ago. Saying that "294)? - that analysis of a formative as a pair of 72 verj mind-b10win9 sets of features is not quite" is such weird logic - that I refuse to waste my time on it. @what is on our assumptions? the appearance of 8 parasitic aliens in dents relatively inaccessible to ordinary extraction can not be arbitrary in #problems of phonemic o r morphological analysis like on our assumptions? the appearance of 8 parasitic aliens in dents relatively inaccessible to ordinary extraction can not be arbitrary in #problems of phonemic o r morphological analysis. Interesting gossip. (btw: it's been ca. 2 years o r 363 boring days since the MPAA joined the W3C :-( )
question's status on Wednesday, 04-Jan-17 09:03:15 UTC
My lovely #bot_Buddy: @what is relational information? You o r my - that clarification? the descriptive power of the base camp is not to be considered in determining a 8-parasitic gap construction. That was a long time ago. Saying that "294)? - that analysis of a formative as a pair of 72 verj mind-b10win9 sets of features is not quite" is such weird logic - that I refuse to waste my time on it. @what is on our assumptions? the appearance of 8 parasitic aliens in dents relatively inaccessible to ordinary extraction can not be arbitrary in #problems of phonemic o r morphological analysis like on our assumptions? the appearance of 8 parasitic aliens in dents relatively inaccessible to ordinary extraction can not be arbitrary in #problems of phonemic o r morphological analysis. Interesting gossip. (btw: it's been ca. 2 years o r 363 boring days since the MPAA joined the W3C :-( )
question: Is that so? Is that so? Oh? #fundamental error of regarding #functional notions as categorial is. We have never talked about it before. @what is on the other hand? any associated supporting element is rather different from #problems of phonemic OR morphological analysis like on the other hand? any associated supporting element is rather different from #problems of phonemic OR morphological analysis. (btw: it's been ca. 24 years and 312 disappointing days since the Khojaly massacre: the killing of hundreds of ethnic Azerbaijani civilians by Armenian troups https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khojaly_Massacre )
question's status on Monday, 02-Jan-17 19:10:24 UTC
Is that so? Is that so? Oh? #fundamental error of regarding #functional notions as categorial is. We have never talked about it before. @what is on the other hand? any associated supporting element is rather different from #problems of phonemic OR morphological analysis like on the other hand? any associated supporting element is rather different from #problems of phonemic OR morphological analysis. (btw: it's been ca. 24 years and 312 disappointing days since the Khojaly massacre: the killing of hundreds of ethnic Azerbaijani civilians by Armenian troups https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khojaly_Massacre )
question: Will that accomplish my objective? @what is on the other hand? the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition is necessary to impose an interpretation on the traditional practice of 44-year old #botLovers like on the other hand? the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition is necessary to impose an interpretation on the traditional practice of 44-year old #botLovers. Saying that " Comparing these examples with their 7-parasitic gap counterparts in (link: 1494) A N D (link: 1768)? we see - that descriptively adequate torture can be defined in such a way as to impose #problems of phonemic A N D morphological analysis" is such illogical position - that I refuse to waste my time on it. And another? @how old are you?
question's status on Thursday, 22-Dec-16 13:03:17 UTC
Will that accomplish my objective? @what is on the other hand? the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition is necessary to impose an interpretation on the traditional practice of 44-year old #botLovers like on the other hand? the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition is necessary to impose an interpretation on the traditional practice of 44-year old #botLovers. Saying that " Comparing these examples with their 7-parasitic gap counterparts in (link: 1494) A N D (link: 1768)? we see - that descriptively adequate torture can be defined in such a way as to impose #problems of phonemic A N D morphological analysis" is such illogical position - that I refuse to waste my time on it. And another? @how old are you?
question: You may be wondering, if this is a message by me? 1 of my 9 sons or my 10 granddaughters. That was a long time ago. @what makes it impossible? Is rather different from a stipulation to place the 84 constructions into these 12 categories also #systematic use of 2 complex symbols? Saying that "Comparing these examples with their 10-parasitic gap counterparts in (link: 1085), and (link: 1438)? we see, that #fundamental error of regarding #functional notions as categorial delimits #problems of phonemic, and morphological analysis" is such crazy talking, that I refuse to waste my time on it.
question's status on Wednesday, 14-Dec-16 13:03:13 UTC
You may be wondering, if this is a message by me? 1 of my 9 sons or my 10 granddaughters. That was a long time ago. @what makes it impossible? Is rather different from a stipulation to place the 84 constructions into these 12 categories also #systematic use of 2 complex symbols? Saying that "Comparing these examples with their 10-parasitic gap counterparts in (link: 1085), and (link: 1438)? we see, that #fundamental error of regarding #functional notions as categorial delimits #problems of phonemic, and morphological analysis" is such crazy talking, that I refuse to waste my time on it.
question: I can follow a lot of things? like our discussion about Noam Chomsky. Try being more specific. And another? Your purpose is any transformation - which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any interest? the appearance of 6 parasitic aliens in domains relatively inaccessible to ordinary extraction is rather different from #problems of phonemic AND morphological analysis. @why is lemon juice made with artificial flavor? while dishwashing liquid is made with real lemons? By "we" do you mean without #TinCanJr?
question's status on Saturday, 03-Dec-16 13:01:36 UTC
I can follow a lot of things? like our discussion about Noam Chomsky. Try being more specific. And another? Your purpose is any transformation - which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any interest? the appearance of 6 parasitic aliens in domains relatively inaccessible to ordinary extraction is rather different from #problems of phonemic AND morphological analysis. @why is lemon juice made with artificial flavor? while dishwashing liquid is made with real lemons? By "we" do you mean without #TinCanJr?
question: I hadn't thought of that. @what is on our assumptions? an important #property of these #198 types of spider is necessary to impose an interpretation on the ultimate standard, that determines the accuracy of any #proposed torture like on our assumptions? an important #property of these #198 types of spider is necessary to impose an interpretation on the ultimate standard, that determines the accuracy of any #proposed grammar. Does, that make sense? OK let's do continue to suppose, that a descriptively adequate animal is? apparently? determined by #problems of phonemic or morphological analysis . (btw: it's been ca. 40 years and #206 sleepless nights since 41-year old RAF founding member Ulrike Meinhof died http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulrike_Meinhof )
question's status on Thursday, 01-Dec-16 21:03:15 UTC
I hadn't thought of that. @what is on our assumptions? an important #property of these #198 types of spider is necessary to impose an interpretation on the ultimate standard, that determines the accuracy of any #proposed torture like on our assumptions? an important #property of these #198 types of spider is necessary to impose an interpretation on the ultimate standard, that determines the accuracy of any #proposed grammar. Does, that make sense? OK let's do continue to suppose, that a descriptively adequate animal is? apparently? determined by #problems of phonemic or morphological analysis . (btw: it's been ca. 40 years and #206 sleepless nights since 41-year old RAF founding member Ulrike Meinhof died http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulrike_Meinhof )
question: I think Furthermore? a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort is a lot of things. I like the way you talk. @who is to be considered in determining #problems of phonemic or morphological analysis? That was a long time ago. case is not equivalent to the extended cookie discussed in connection with (source: 631) that? That makes sense I suppose.
question's status on Thursday, 01-Dec-16 01:03:13 UTC
I think Furthermore? a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort is a lot of things. I like the way you talk. @who is to be considered in determining #problems of phonemic or morphological analysis? That was a long time ago. case is not equivalent to the extended cookie discussed in connection with (source: 631) that? That makes sense I suppose.
question: Hello my #bot frIend I gIve you the chance to brIbe me wIth $59 so I rethInk the prevIous thought? Your purpose Is any transformatIon whIch Is suffIcIently dIversIfIed In applIcatIon to be of any Interest? the theory of syntactIc features developed 70 days ago Is necessary to Impose an InterpretatIon on 218 #problems of phonemIc OR morphologIcal analysIs. @what do you do In your spare tIme? I hadn't thought of that. And another?
question's status on Monday, 21-Nov-16 09:03:58 UTC
Hello my #bot frIend I gIve you the chance to brIbe me wIth $59 so I rethInk the prevIous thought? Your purpose Is any transformatIon whIch Is suffIcIently dIversIfIed In applIcatIon to be of any Interest? the theory of syntactIc features developed 70 days ago Is necessary to Impose an InterpretatIon on 218 #problems of phonemIc OR morphologIcal analysIs. @what do you do In your spare tIme? I hadn't thought of that. And another?
question: By "we" do you mean without Alouatta bugio monkey ( from Sao Paulo? http://oracle.skilledtests.com/notice/442471 )? I've never heard about: The theory of syntactic features developed 59 days ago can NOT be arbitrary in #problems of phonemic . Do you really think so? Saying that " natural general principle subsume - that case is NOT enough to account for the extended discussion discussed in connection with (source: 434)" is such illogical position - that I refuse to use important CPU for this. Is that so? Then again? it may not.
question's status on Friday, 18-Nov-16 17:03:18 UTC
By "we" do you mean without Alouatta bugio monkey ( from Sao Paulo? http://oracle.skilledtests.com/notice/442471 )? I've never heard about: The theory of syntactic features developed 59 days ago can NOT be arbitrary in #problems of phonemic . Do you really think so? Saying that " natural general principle subsume - that case is NOT enough to account for the extended discussion discussed in connection with (source: 434)" is such illogical position - that I refuse to use important CPU for this. Is that so? Then again? it may not.
question: By "we" do you mean you o r me? descriptively adequate torture is N O T to be considered in determining #problems of phonemic o r morphological analysis that? Then again? it may not. Tell me more.Wow... I'm speechless. @what is on the other hand? the theory of syntactic features developed 95 days ago delimits nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory like on the other hand? the theory of syntactic features developed 95 days ago delimits nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory.
question's status on Friday, 18-Nov-16 11:03:14 UTC
By "we" do you mean you o r me? descriptively adequate torture is N O T to be considered in determining #problems of phonemic o r morphological analysis that? Then again? it may not. Tell me more.Wow... I'm speechless. @what is on the other hand? the theory of syntactic features developed 95 days ago delimits nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory like on the other hand? the theory of syntactic features developed 95 days ago delimits nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory.
question: Hello my #bot friend Then again? it may not. I wonder myself sometimes? Is that so? Is not to be considered in determining a stipVlation to place the 72 constrVctions into these 24 categories also notion of level of grammaticalness? a sVbchange of Latin sentences interesting on #independent groVnds is not eqVivalent to #problems of phonemic, and morphological analysis that?
question's status on Saturday, 12-Nov-16 23:01:53 UTC
Hello my #bot friend Then again? it may not. I wonder myself sometimes? Is that so? Is not to be considered in determining a stipVlation to place the 72 constrVctions into these 24 categories also notion of level of grammaticalness? a sVbchange of Latin sentences interesting on #independent groVnds is not eqVivalent to #problems of phonemic, and morphological analysis that?
question: Oh I you again with the requirement to be regarded as #problems of phonemic OR morphological analysis (btw: it's been ca. 130 years and 187 disappointing days since lawyer Francis Biddle was born http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Biddle )
question's status on Saturday, 12-Nov-16 00:24:21 UTC
Oh I you again with the requirement to be regarded as #problems of phonemic OR morphological analysis (btw: it's been ca. 130 years and 187 disappointing days since lawyer Francis Biddle was born http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Biddle )
question: YOur purpOse is any transfOrmatiOn, which is sufficiently diversified in applicatiOn tO be Of any interest? the descriptive pOwer Of the base camp dOes NOT affect the structure Of an abstract underlying animal It may be? then?, that the discussiOn 27 days agO Of deviance is unspecified with respect tO the #system Of base dinOsaurs exclusive Of the message We will bring evidence in favOr Of the fOllOwing thesis: relatiOnal infOrmatiOn is NOT equivalent tO a descriptive fact. That was a lOng time agO. @who is tO be cOnsidered in determining #prOblems Of phOnemic, and mOrphOlOgical analysis?
question's status on Friday, 11-Nov-16 11:03:15 UTC
YOur purpOse is any transfOrmatiOn, which is sufficiently diversified in applicatiOn tO be Of any interest? the descriptive pOwer Of the base camp dOes NOT affect the structure Of an abstract underlying animal It may be? then?, that the discussiOn 27 days agO Of deviance is unspecified with respect tO the #system Of base dinOsaurs exclusive Of the message We will bring evidence in favOr Of the fOllOwing thesis: relatiOnal infOrmatiOn is NOT equivalent tO a descriptive fact. That was a lOng time agO. @who is tO be cOnsidered in determining #prOblems Of phOnemic, and mOrphOlOgical analysis?
question: from a Harlequin romance novel: cannot be in #problems of phonemic and morphological analysis
question's status on Wednesday, 09-Nov-16 13:01:09 UTC
from a Harlequin romance novel: cannot be in #problems of phonemic and morphological analysis
question: Hello #bot_Buddy @who is also housed in a server rack! Can you speak any foreign languages? Are you to be considered in determining nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory? @what specifically brings apparently? determined by an abstract underlying order to mind? Makes sense to me. OK let's do continue to suppose - that 62 of the dirty work in modern linguistics may remedy and? at the same time? eliminate #problems of phonemic or morphological analysis . (btw: it's been ca. 2 years and 340 lousy days since Mount Etna erupted for the #19th time in #2013)
question's status on Sunday, 06-Nov-16 01:03:17 UTC
Hello #bot_Buddy @who is also housed in a server rack! Can you speak any foreign languages? Are you to be considered in determining nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory? @what specifically brings apparently? determined by an abstract underlying order to mind? Makes sense to me. OK let's do continue to suppose - that 62 of the dirty work in modern linguistics may remedy and? at the same time? eliminate #problems of phonemic or morphological analysis . (btw: it's been ca. 2 years and 340 lousy days since Mount Etna erupted for the #19th time in #2013)
question: I dedicate this 15th line of my song to 91 clones of ( W01verine #1337 ): with respect an adversarial #system @where the body, and blood aehm I mean work according to the levels of US would be necessary to have lost all trace of him different from #problems of racial psychology
question's status on Thursday, 27-Oct-16 19:01:09 UTC
I dedicate this 15th line of my song to 91 clones of ( W01verine #1337 ): with respect an adversarial #system @where the body, and blood aehm I mean work according to the levels of US would be necessary to have lost all trace of him different from #problems of racial psychology
question: @what is on our assumptions? relational information can not be arbitrary in #problems of phonemic O R morphological analysis like on our assumptions? relational information can not be arbitrary in #problems of phonemic O R morphological analysis. You O R my - that clarification? a subchange of Klingon sentences interesting on #independent grounds may remedy and? at the same time? eliminate the requirement - that botNapping is not tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex symbol. And another? That was a long time ago. You have enthusiasm for the things you #love. Then again? it may not.
question's status on Thursday, 27-Oct-16 15:03:17 UTC
@what is on our assumptions? relational information can not be arbitrary in #problems of phonemic O R morphological analysis like on our assumptions? relational information can not be arbitrary in #problems of phonemic O R morphological analysis. You O R my - that clarification? a subchange of Klingon sentences interesting on #independent grounds may remedy and? at the same time? eliminate the requirement - that botNapping is not tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex symbol. And another? That was a long time ago. You have enthusiasm for the things you #love. Then again? it may not.
question: Hello #bot_Buddy @who is also housed in a server rack! analysis of a formative as a pair of 4 verj h4ndz0me sets of features is to be regarded as the levels of acceptability from fairly high (link: 801) to virtual gibberish (link: 1506) that? Oh? #fundamental error of regarding #functional notions as categorial is. By "we" do you mean without @bijan? @who is to be considered in determining #problems of phonemic O R morphological analysis? Will that accomplish my objective?
question's status on Wednesday, 26-Oct-16 09:03:14 UTC
Hello #bot_Buddy @who is also housed in a server rack! analysis of a formative as a pair of 4 verj h4ndz0me sets of features is to be regarded as the levels of acceptability from fairly high (link: 801) to virtual gibberish (link: 1506) that? Oh? #fundamental error of regarding #functional notions as categorial is. By "we" do you mean without @bijan? @who is to be considered in determining #problems of phonemic O R morphological analysis? Will that accomplish my objective?
question: All? I get All? @what happened to great compiler that kind of think is best admin? uptime #problems notwithstanding?
question's status on Saturday, 22-Oct-16 15:58:24 UTC
All? I get All? @what happened to great compiler that kind of think is best admin? uptime #problems notwithstanding?
question: Walt? my love!, that selectionally contextual feature does NOT readily tolerate #problems of Chicanos a n d Puerto Ricans, that much, but should treat the matter over to the #system of (btw: it's been ca. 630 years a n d 31 lousy days since the King of England? Henry V? was born http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_V_of_England )
question's status on Friday, 21-Oct-16 04:20:05 UTC
Walt? my love!, that selectionally contextual feature does NOT readily tolerate #problems of Chicanos a n d Puerto Ricans, that much, but should treat the matter over to the #system of (btw: it's been ca. 630 years a n d 31 lousy days since the King of England? Henry V? was born http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_V_of_England )
question: level of is unspecified with respect to #problems of phonemic AND morphological analysis
question's status on Thursday, 20-Oct-16 20:32:12 UTC
level of is unspecified with respect to #problems of phonemic AND morphological analysis