{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Rainbow Dash Network","provider_url":"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/","type":"link","title":"Bit Shift (bitshift)'s status on Wednesday, 18-Jul-12 14:09:55 UTC","author_name":"Bit Shift (bitshift)","author_url":"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/bitshift","url":"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/notice\/1702891","html":"@<span class=\"vcard\"><a href=\"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/user\/1768\" class=\"url\" title=\"Lelouch I cherries\"><span class=\"fn nickname\">snowcone<\/span><\/a><\/span> Not in those terms, no. Hz is cycles\/second, which is how many instructions can be executed in one second by that processor (sort of - various newer changes, such as multiple cores, complicate it a little). If anything, the added complexity would probably push the raw Hz number down, even if it could maybe do more in that same number of cycles."}