{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Rainbow Dash Network","provider_url":"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/","type":"link","title":"Lee (beatstrings)'s status on Friday, 25-Oct-13 05:54:39 UTC","author_name":"Lee (beatstrings)","author_url":"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/beatstrings","url":"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/notice\/3076489","html":"@<span class=\"vcard\"><a href=\"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/user\/29830\" class=\"url\" title=\"Awl Derpy\"><span class=\"fn nickname\">awlderpy<\/span><\/a><\/span> Well, take it this way, this is a disciplinary wise setting for a progressing country. Simply put, having to at least input a small generation of self centered workers will avoid the next generation being overly dependent. And the idea I think she's pin pointing is if we started in ourselves, nothing will be harmed. Like it's a positive aftermath, right. But I think you're doubting that maybe healthcare benefits, blood donation and family support won't exist. I'd say 50\/50 maybe because the every man for himself scheme is for the work force the country is making. It's not a control freak plan to grasp into a man and make him non-emotional so the speak. And I'm sure the government won't let harsh punishment for law breakers. Maybe just a more controlled justice of sorts is what she's stroking on."}