{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Rainbow Dash Network","provider_url":"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/","type":"link","title":"\u3070\u3063\u3070\u304b\u72ac\u3059\u3063\u597d\u304d\u3058\u3083\u3063\u3058\u3083\u306a\u3044\u3088 (bakasenpai)'s status on Friday, 24-Jan-14 21:51:50 UTC","author_name":"\u3070\u3063\u3070\u304b\u72ac\u3059\u3063\u597d\u304d\u3058\u3083\u3063\u3058\u3083\u306a\u3044\u3088 (bakasenpai)","author_url":"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/bakasenpai","url":"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/notice\/3264315","html":"@<span class=\"vcard\"><a href=\"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/user\/30324\" class=\"url\" title=\"Cerulean Lulamoon-Spark\"><span class=\"fn nickname mention\">ceruleanspark<\/span><\/a><\/span> I have a whole page on why that is unconstitutional in it's self and they actually could overturn that ruling in this case if they wanted to (but they won't).  Is a phone considered a personal effect though?  Are your pictures on it private?  Due to the nature of smartphones I say that &quot;If any part of a cellular device, particularly of smart devices, that can be accessed violates the fourth amendment the court must rule against access to the phone as a whole because all aspects of it are connected and therefore accessing one part effectively accesses all.&quot;"}