{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Rainbow Dash Network","provider_url":"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/","type":"link","title":"awlxa\u013aan (awl)'s status on Friday, 02-Jan-15 03:52:53 UTC","author_name":"awlxa\u013aan (awl)","author_url":"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/awl","url":"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/notice\/3787676","html":"@<span class=\"vcard\"><a href=\"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/user\/4526\" class=\"url\" title=\"&#x30DB;&#x30E2;&#x307E;&#x3064;&#x308A;\"><span class=\"fn nickname mention\">mastertdi<\/span><\/a><\/span> In the two Dickens books I have read last year he uses the ' ' for dialogue and &quot; &quot; for dialogue within said dialogue.  I always wrote that off as an older form of usage as it seems to be the opposite nowadays."}