{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Rainbow Dash Network","provider_url":"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/","type":"link","title":"Edward Engelhardt (pizzicato)'s status on Tuesday, 16-Aug-11 04:32:31 UTC","author_name":"Edward Engelhardt (pizzicato)","author_url":"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/pizzicato","url":"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/notice\/401606","html":"@<span class=\"vcard\"><a href=\"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/user\/112\" class=\"url\" title=\"Alex\"><span class=\"fn nickname\">celestiaforequestria<\/span><\/a><\/span> The only post I do is futzing with the contrast a bit 'cause negative scanners like to blowout the highlights. And those shots were really really grainy 'cause I push processed them to 6400 iso. I metered at 3200, but I knew they were really really low light shots, so I pushed 'em to 6400. Film's a lot of fun, but expensive. Rolls of film are $10 a pop anymore, and you burn through 36 shots a lot quicker than you think. Or you burn 32 shots and you're like 'son of a bananas I really wanna take four more pictures so I can develop this thing!' I've never tried light painting, but I think that's 'cause I black and white film photography and light painting don't really get along."}