{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Rainbow Dash Network","provider_url":"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/","type":"link","title":"Narwhal (narwhal)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Mar-16 02:14:47 UTC","author_name":"Narwhal (narwhal)","author_url":"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/narwhal","url":"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/notice\/4097973","html":"@<span class=\"vcard\"><a href=\"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/user\/33377\" class=\"url\" title=\"Awlxa&#x13A;an kza p&#x131;r&#x131;nc atakz&#xEB;\"><span class=\"fn nickname mention\">awl<\/span><\/a><\/span> Yeah, the reconstructionist perspective places a much greater emphasis on the distinct structure of the language, whereas Schleicher's interpretation focuses on how disparate vocabulary would construct narrative. Both require a specific context exhibited by language that is missing from PIE outright, so meditations on it are meditations on the nature of language itself. It's interesting to really ponder."}