{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Rainbow Dash Network","provider_url":"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/","type":"link","title":"orungano (tiff)'s status on Thursday, 03-Nov-16 21:50:46 UTC","author_name":"orungano (tiff)","author_url":"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/tiff","url":"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/notice\/4417166","html":"@<span class=\"vcard\"><a href=\"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/user\/1766\" class=\"url\" title=\"Zenneth Ryver-Styx\"><span class=\"fn nickname mention\">zennx<\/span><\/a><\/span> 1) I think you're missing the step that goes between a study and the application of said study<br \/>2) I think you're implying that it's better to not do anything at all than to try to fix something? If so... agree to disagree, I guess?<br \/>3) I think you might be confusing psychology with something else, because I can't see any way to apply my idea of psychology to actual risk of death, even when it comes to the least morally sound psychologists like Milgram. I mean, when it comes to, say, someone claiming vaccines cause autism with no actual basis and people take THAT as fact, then absolutely that's terrible, but that's a different realm of science entirely, so I still don't know where you're coming from in regards to the study of the mind"}