{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Rainbow Dash Network","provider_url":"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/","type":"link","title":"orungano (tiff)'s status on Friday, 21-Feb-20 17:07:32 UTC","author_name":"orungano (tiff)","author_url":"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/tiff","url":"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/notice\/5469782","html":"@mrmattimation<\/span><\/a><\/span> @scribus<\/span><\/a><\/span> I think ultimately it's a semantic difference more than anything. some people interpret "bi" as a term that excludes enby\/intersex folks but this is obviously not necessarily true - for some people it might just be more convenient as it's pretty widely understood, or it might just sound better to them. "pan" is a more recent prefix to sound more all-encompassing, but this will inevitably be subject to confusion and the same joke over and over. i don't think either term is inherently exclusionary (although i do think most terms for sexuality are clunky and outdated at this point) and it kind of just comes down to what word you prefer the sound\/feel of and how you want to present yourself"}