{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Rainbow Dash Network","provider_url":"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/","type":"link","title":"Michael (egnaroesroh)'s status on Friday, 14-Oct-11 23:06:58 UTC","author_name":"Michael (egnaroesroh)","author_url":"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/egnaroesroh","url":"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/notice\/627646","html":"@<span class=\"vcard\"><a href=\"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/user\/3546\" class=\"url\" title=\"Austin Hedeen\"><span class=\"fn nickname\">bejoty<\/span><\/a><\/span> @<span class=\"vcard\"><a href=\"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/user\/1\" class=\"url\"><span class=\"fn nickname\">cabal<\/span><\/a><\/span> @<span class=\"vcard\"><a href=\"http:\/\/rainbowdash.net\/user\/488\" class=\"url\" title=\"Purple Tinker\"><span class=\"fn nickname\">purpletinker<\/span><\/a><\/span> Don't get me wrong, your article had good points and things we should be watching for, but I do kind of think the article could have touched on the subject a little more cautiously. While it did a good job warning of the dangers of being interviewed unprepared, it came off to me as &quot;We must be normal, everyone who's 'different' stay away.&quot; which seems like a bad message when that would practically be the same thing they're doing, but looking for normal people instead of &quot;strange&quot; ones. Was this intentional or did it just end up like that? Just consider this a curious question."}