1.0 link Rainbow Dash Network http://rainbowdash.net/ Crusader 8 (princelypublictimeline) http://rainbowdash.net/princelypublictimeline http://rainbowdash.net/notice/1093433 so @<span class="vcard"><a href="http://rainbowdash.net/user/6761" class="url" title="My real name"><span class="fn nickname">pony</span></a></span> you prefer to think time doesn't exist because of the variable scales in which it can be scrutinized (which ultimately is just an argument of measurement nomenclature when certain converted denominations seem less significant) and @<span class="vcard"><a href="http://rainbowdash.net/user/2678" class="url" title="Crazy"><span class="fn nickname">commodorecrazycommanderofthe1stroyalbrigadeofspiceracksandcheese</span></a></span> you offer time branches out, although that line of thinking isn't compatible to the nature of time measuring when matter was like so and now it's like that. I think when both of you think of time you're thinking of clocks, repeating periods and annuals. The record of time is not time itself. If we didn't record time (aka historical documentation) there wouldn't be a lot of the ideas and theories of time which border more on the philosophical.