<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<oembed>
 <version>1.0</version>
 <type>link</type>
 <provider_name>Rainbow Dash Network</provider_name>
 <provider_url>http://rainbowdash.net/</provider_url>
 <title>RDN's Lucifer (nerthos)'s status on Tuesday, 17-Apr-12 01:16:05 UTC</title>
 <author_name>RDN's Lucifer (nerthos)</author_name>
 <author_url>http://rainbowdash.net/nerthos</author_url>
 <url>http://rainbowdash.net/notice/1227808</url>
 <html>@&lt;span class=&quot;vcard&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://rainbowdash.net/user/2959&quot; class=&quot;url&quot; title=&quot;The Pony Formerly Known As Ponydude&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fn nickname&quot;&gt;widget&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Thing with this kind of arguments, is that they are pretty much like car arguments. It's like saying &amp;quot;Don't use that '70s car, there are newer cars that use less fuel and do less noise&amp;quot; But the thing is, I like that '70s car, I always used it, I know what it will do in any given circumstance, and I know how to fix anything that might break. Yeah, I could buy one of those new cars, but they're ugly, weak, unnecesarily complex, I need to bother in buying one, and I can't easily fix them. The '70s one is more than I need. There's no point in buying another ne just because it's sopposedly better.</html>
</oembed>
