<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<oembed>
 <version>1.0</version>
 <type>link</type>
 <provider_name>Rainbow Dash Network</provider_name>
 <provider_url>http://rainbowdash.net/</provider_url>
 <title>Bit Shift (bitshift)'s status on Thursday, 30-Aug-12 20:45:42 UTC</title>
 <author_name>Bit Shift (bitshift)</author_name>
 <author_url>http://rainbowdash.net/bitshift</author_url>
 <url>http://rainbowdash.net/notice/1869082</url>
 <html>@&lt;span class=&quot;vcard&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://rainbowdash.net/user/6850&quot; class=&quot;url&quot; title=&quot;Minti - Element of Procrastination&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fn nickname&quot;&gt;minti&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; In fairness, the problem with that article is that using an architecture built with a focus on concurrent IO for fibonacci calculation is a bad starting idea. Which is not to say that it's not a nasty flaw, but it's a flaw in an area where you shouldn't even be using node in the first place.</html>
</oembed>
