<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<oembed>
 <version>1.0</version>
 <type>link</type>
 <provider_name>Rainbow Dash Network</provider_name>
 <provider_url>http://rainbowdash.net/</provider_url>
 <title>Toksyuryel (toksyuryel)'s status on Thursday, 13-Sep-12 20:48:14 UTC</title>
 <author_name>Toksyuryel (toksyuryel)</author_name>
 <author_url>http://rainbowdash.net/toksyuryel</author_url>
 <url>http://rainbowdash.net/notice/1914969</url>
 <html>@&lt;span class=&quot;vcard&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://rainbowdash.net/user/6761&quot; class=&quot;url&quot; title=&quot;Pony&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fn nickname&quot;&gt;pony&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; It's not a case of the software being &amp;quot;compatible&amp;quot;. The software isn't &amp;quot;incompatible&amp;quot; with the processor, it just isn't programmed to take advantage of the additional cores. Which in many cases is just fine, not every task *can* be split into multiple threads. Rewriting existing software to use multiple threads also takes a long time and is very error-prone. But this isn't really a problem if you treat the main benefit as enabling better multitasking, because then it doesn't matter if a one piece of software uses just one thread as that just leaves room for other pieces of software to use the other cores.</html>
</oembed>
