<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<oembed>
 <version>1.0</version>
 <type>link</type>
 <provider_name>Rainbow Dash Network</provider_name>
 <provider_url>http://rainbowdash.net/</provider_url>
 <title>A Big Pony (bigpony)'s status on Thursday, 15-Nov-12 07:57:45 UTC</title>
 <author_name>A Big Pony (bigpony)</author_name>
 <author_url>http://rainbowdash.net/bigpony</author_url>
 <url>http://rainbowdash.net/notice/2090829</url>
 <html>@&lt;span class=&quot;vcard&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://rainbowdash.net/user/26890&quot; class=&quot;url&quot; title=&quot;Trey Crain&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fn nickname&quot;&gt;electroidfire&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Well I never played the first one, the second one was great, and the third one was full of the same thing over and over again. Modern warfare had pretty fun multi-player with maps that were actually half-decent to play on. I'm alright with 4 because they changed their era, upped the quality of their online, and it was the first in the series to introduce the &amp;quot;rushing&amp;quot; kind of multiplayer. As glitchy and underrated as it was, WaW was the same thing, but brought back to their original battlegrounds. It had so many updates throughout it's time, though, that it was never really fairly balanced.</html>
</oembed>
