<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<oembed>
 <version>1.0</version>
 <type>link</type>
 <provider_name>Rainbow Dash Network</provider_name>
 <provider_url>http://rainbowdash.net/</provider_url>
 <title>RedEnchilada (notice the lack of a space) (redenchilada)'s status on Sunday, 16-Dec-12 18:54:06 UTC</title>
 <author_name>RedEnchilada (notice the lack of a space) (redenchilada)</author_name>
 <author_url>http://rainbowdash.net/redenchilada</author_url>
 <url>http://rainbowdash.net/notice/2177164</url>
 <html>@&lt;span class=&quot;vcard&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://rainbowdash.net/user/7875&quot; class=&quot;url&quot; title=&quot;Omni&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fn nickname&quot;&gt;omni&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Let me try to explain with an analogy; imagine you're electronically-illiterate and you want a radio in your car. In scenario A, you get a car with no radio and you have two choices of radio to purchase in the store. Since you're spending extra on the radio anyway, might as well go all-out and get the more expensive one, right? More expensive obviously == better features, which is a better use of money! (remember, technologically-illiterate) But in scenario B, the car you got comes with a free radio, and the one at the store would cost extra. The one at the store may be better, but if what you have comes with a stereo already, why spend extra? Thus, bundling the radio in for free means it gets more market share, which means the more expensive addon radio won't last as long.</html>
</oembed>
