<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<oembed>
 <version>1.0</version>
 <type>link</type>
 <provider_name>Rainbow Dash Network</provider_name>
 <provider_url>http://rainbowdash.net/</provider_url>
 <title>Lee (beatstrings)'s status on Friday, 25-Oct-13 05:54:39 UTC</title>
 <author_name>Lee (beatstrings)</author_name>
 <author_url>http://rainbowdash.net/beatstrings</author_url>
 <url>http://rainbowdash.net/notice/3076489</url>
 <html>@&lt;span class=&quot;vcard&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://rainbowdash.net/user/29830&quot; class=&quot;url&quot; title=&quot;Awl Derpy&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fn nickname&quot;&gt;awlderpy&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Well, take it this way, this is a disciplinary wise setting for a progressing country. Simply put, having to at least input a small generation of self centered workers will avoid the next generation being overly dependent. And the idea I think she's pin pointing is if we started in ourselves, nothing will be harmed. Like it's a positive aftermath, right. But I think you're doubting that maybe healthcare benefits, blood donation and family support won't exist. I'd say 50/50 maybe because the every man for himself scheme is for the work force the country is making. It's not a control freak plan to grasp into a man and make him non-emotional so the speak. And I'm sure the government won't let harsh punishment for law breakers. Maybe just a more controlled justice of sorts is what she's stroking on.</html>
</oembed>
