<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<oembed>
 <version>1.0</version>
 <type>link</type>
 <provider_name>Rainbow Dash Network</provider_name>
 <provider_url>http://rainbowdash.net/</provider_url>
 <title>ばっばか犬すっ好きじゃっじゃないよ (bakasenpai)'s status on Friday, 24-Jan-14 21:51:50 UTC</title>
 <author_name>ばっばか犬すっ好きじゃっじゃないよ (bakasenpai)</author_name>
 <author_url>http://rainbowdash.net/bakasenpai</author_url>
 <url>http://rainbowdash.net/notice/3264315</url>
 <html>@&lt;span class=&quot;vcard&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://rainbowdash.net/user/30324&quot; class=&quot;url&quot; title=&quot;Cerulean Lulamoon-Spark&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fn nickname mention&quot;&gt;ceruleanspark&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; I have a whole page on why that is unconstitutional in it's self and they actually could overturn that ruling in this case if they wanted to (but they won't).  Is a phone considered a personal effect though?  Are your pictures on it private?  Due to the nature of smartphones I say that &amp;quot;If any part of a cellular device, particularly of smart devices, that can be accessed violates the fourth amendment the court must rule against access to the phone as a whole because all aspects of it are connected and therefore accessing one part effectively accesses all.&amp;quot;</html>
</oembed>
