<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<oembed>
 <version>1.0</version>
 <type>link</type>
 <provider_name>Rainbow Dash Network</provider_name>
 <provider_url>http://rainbowdash.net/</provider_url>
 <title>Narwhal (narwhal)'s status on Friday, 30-May-14 00:32:45 UTC</title>
 <author_name>Narwhal (narwhal)</author_name>
 <author_url>http://rainbowdash.net/narwhal</author_url>
 <url>http://rainbowdash.net/notice/3439007</url>
 <html>@&lt;span class=&quot;vcard&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://rainbowdash.net/user/1768&quot; class=&quot;url&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fn nickname mention&quot;&gt;snowcone&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; No, it is understanding because it's regarding awareness. Does the computer know &lt;i&gt;why&lt;/i&gt; it is holding the ball on the stick or is it only doing it because it's the only thing it knows how to do? Also, even if it can be programmed to &amp;quot;choose&amp;quot; to hold the ball, without a concept of punishment it has no real reason to hold the ball other than that it's supposed to. Humans have a broader cognizance of cause and effect, which is how their decision making process is different from computers. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Also, no problem in regards to solving your boredom. You're a really, really intelligent guy and it's nice to have such a stimulating but civil conversation. On that note, everything I'm saying here is my opinion, I could be wrong but it's nice to discuss both sides of these things.</html>
</oembed>
