1.0 link Rainbow Dash Network http://rainbowdash.net/ Cloud Kicker (critialcloudkicker) http://rainbowdash.net/critialcloudkicker http://rainbowdash.net/notice/3688052 @<span class="vcard"><a href="http://rainbowdash.net/user/2706" class="url" title="a weird entophile who feels attracted to purple cartoon characters"><span class="fn nickname mention">kumo</span></a></span> Too bad it is a stupid analogy used right there. In fact a talk about law and justice with a 1 year old who still makes poopy diaper might make better results ( In both conversation and diaper contents ). First of all, putting &quot;probably&quot; in a <a href="http://change.org/" title="http://Change.org/" rel="nofollow external">change.org</a> thing is borderline dumb. Secondly the &quot;antitrust law&quot; is a law to <span class="smallt">let me just rip this from wikipedia so I won't screw this up</span> &quot;generally to promote fair competition for the benefit of consumers.&quot;, meaning ( in part ) that Nintendo can not prohibit Sony from making a platform brawler ( like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PlayStation_All-Stars_Battle_Royale" title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PlayStation_All-Stars_Battle_Royale" rel="nofollow external">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PlayStation_All-Stars_Battle_Royale</a> ), even though the actual law kinda goes out the door when you are talking about individual proprietary IP rights and laws than antitrust laws, but hey can't really blame them for trying. I can see why you want Smash Bros on the Vita though. But I probably see peace in the middle east before Nintendo and Sony do a cooperative thing on that level.