<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<oembed>
 <version>1.0</version>
 <type>link</type>
 <provider_name>Rainbow Dash Network</provider_name>
 <provider_url>http://rainbowdash.net/</provider_url>
 <title>Narwhal (narwhal)'s status on Thursday, 19-Mar-15 03:56:42 UTC</title>
 <author_name>Narwhal (narwhal)</author_name>
 <author_url>http://rainbowdash.net/narwhal</author_url>
 <url>http://rainbowdash.net/notice/3882653</url>
 <html>@&lt;span class=&quot;vcard&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://rainbowdash.net/user/2706&quot; class=&quot;url&quot; title=&quot;a weird entophile who feels attracted to purple cartoon characters&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fn nickname mention&quot;&gt;mushi&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; In that scene, the way a fully clothed character is perceived is based on her own intention. The show is not fetishizing characters for the sake of objectification; it’s providing a lens that’s crucial to the tone of any given scene. This kind of insight into the thought patterns of a character as well as the development of a show’s theme and atmosphere is a far cry from how “fanservice” is defined earlier. To simply pigeon hole it as mindless perversion is missing the entire point, and is generally a thoughtless accusation levelled at a misunderstood series.</html>
</oembed>
