<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<oembed>
 <version>1.0</version>
 <type>link</type>
 <provider_name>Rainbow Dash Network</provider_name>
 <provider_url>http://rainbowdash.net/</provider_url>
 <title>Narwhal (narwhal)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Mar-16 02:14:47 UTC</title>
 <author_name>Narwhal (narwhal)</author_name>
 <author_url>http://rainbowdash.net/narwhal</author_url>
 <url>http://rainbowdash.net/notice/4097973</url>
 <html>@&lt;span class=&quot;vcard&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://rainbowdash.net/user/33377&quot; class=&quot;url&quot; title=&quot;Awlxa&amp;#x13A;an kza p&amp;#x131;r&amp;#x131;nc atakz&amp;#xEB;&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fn nickname mention&quot;&gt;awl&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Yeah, the reconstructionist perspective places a much greater emphasis on the distinct structure of the language, whereas Schleicher's interpretation focuses on how disparate vocabulary would construct narrative. Both require a specific context exhibited by language that is missing from PIE outright, so meditations on it are meditations on the nature of language itself. It's interesting to really ponder.</html>
</oembed>
