<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<oembed>
 <version>1.0</version>
 <type>link</type>
 <provider_name>Rainbow Dash Network</provider_name>
 <provider_url>http://rainbowdash.net/</provider_url>
 <title>orungano (tiff)'s status on Thursday, 03-Nov-16 21:50:46 UTC</title>
 <author_name>orungano (tiff)</author_name>
 <author_url>http://rainbowdash.net/tiff</author_url>
 <url>http://rainbowdash.net/notice/4417166</url>
 <html>@&lt;span class=&quot;vcard&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://rainbowdash.net/user/1766&quot; class=&quot;url&quot; title=&quot;Zenneth Ryver-Styx&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fn nickname mention&quot;&gt;zennx&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; 1) I think you're missing the step that goes between a study and the application of said study&lt;br /&gt;2) I think you're implying that it's better to not do anything at all than to try to fix something? If so... agree to disagree, I guess?&lt;br /&gt;3) I think you might be confusing psychology with something else, because I can't see any way to apply my idea of psychology to actual risk of death, even when it comes to the least morally sound psychologists like Milgram. I mean, when it comes to, say, someone claiming vaccines cause autism with no actual basis and people take THAT as fact, then absolutely that's terrible, but that's a different realm of science entirely, so I still don't know where you're coming from in regards to the study of the mind</html>
</oembed>
