<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<oembed>
 <version>1.0</version>
 <type>link</type>
 <provider_name>Rainbow Dash Network</provider_name>
 <provider_url>http://rainbowdash.net/</provider_url>
 <title>orungano (tiff)'s status on Friday, 21-Feb-20 17:07:32 UTC</title>
 <author_name>orungano (tiff)</author_name>
 <author_url>http://rainbowdash.net/tiff</author_url>
 <url>http://rainbowdash.net/notice/5469782</url>
 <html>@&lt;span class=&quot;vcard&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://rainbowdash.net/user/17847&quot; class=&quot;url&quot; title=&quot;Angry Liberal&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fn nickname mention&quot;&gt;mrmattimation&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; @&lt;span class=&quot;vcard&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://rainbowdash.net/user/60&quot; class=&quot;url&quot; title=&quot;Scribus&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fn nickname mention&quot;&gt;scribus&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; I think ultimately it's a semantic difference more than anything. some people interpret &amp;quot;bi&amp;quot; as a term that excludes enby/intersex folks but this is obviously not necessarily true - for some people it might just be more convenient as it's pretty widely understood, or it might just sound better to them. &amp;quot;pan&amp;quot; is a more recent prefix to sound more all-encompassing, but this will inevitably be subject to confusion and the same joke over and over. i don't think either term is inherently exclusionary (although i do think most terms for sexuality are clunky and outdated at this point) and it kind of just comes down to what word you prefer the sound/feel of and how you want to present yourself</html>
</oembed>
