Replies to 1pony4all, page 3

  1. @1pony4all Fraid so

    Wednesday, 27-Nov-13 20:41:58 UTC from web in context
  2. @1pony4all YES SIR!

    Wednesday, 27-Nov-13 19:34:32 UTC from web in context
  3. @1pony4all I updated the entire website from work

    Wednesday, 27-Nov-13 19:29:16 UTC from web in context
  4. @1pony4all i am tweeting and dashing from work all the time :x being a pion is better.

    Wednesday, 27-Nov-13 19:27:36 UTC from web in context
  5. @1pony4all But to put it shortly as long as you don't outright seek trouble or do anything illegal, you'll be fine.

    Wednesday, 27-Nov-13 05:44:37 UTC from web in context
  6. @1pony4all Rest easy. Whilst we do have one or two moderators that are quick to offense, in the current stage rules are if anything, erring on the side of laxness. Even then, we're just out of a sort of civil war-thing that thankfully ended in good terms, and managed to quell the animosity between some users and usher in peace and civility. If you have any questions about the rules, you're free to ask around. Of the currently online users Coffeecream is your best bet, he's one of our best moderators. I'm an former mod myself, but that was before the current administration, when rules were far tighter.

    Wednesday, 27-Nov-13 05:43:42 UTC from web in context
  7. @1pony4all Never too late to start over! Welcome back. We've had some changes since the early days, most notably five administrations and four to six marked stages when it comes to the community. Still, if there's a thing that survives from ye olden days is an overall willingness to make new friends without much trouble.

    Wednesday, 27-Nov-13 05:30:57 UTC from web in context
  8. @1pony4all *volunteers*

    Wednesday, 27-Nov-13 05:25:24 UTC from web in context
  9. @nerthos @1pony4all Rotation shows up now and then too.

    Wednesday, 27-Nov-13 05:17:57 UTC from web in context
  10. @1pony4all Of the really old users, as of now we have Scribus, Dezzie, Gherkin and Rarity I think. Carcino will probably come back eventually.

    Wednesday, 27-Nov-13 05:16:01 UTC from web in context
  11. @1pony4all Coolness. I've only been here for around 3 weeks or something. 'Only been a brony since May, really.

    Wednesday, 27-Nov-13 04:58:21 UTC from web in context
  12. @1pony4all How long has this place been here?

    Wednesday, 27-Nov-13 04:48:54 UTC from web in context
  13. @1pony4all Apparently a lot of people know.

    Wednesday, 27-Nov-13 04:40:45 UTC from web in context
  14. @1pony4all There is none. Life is boring. just a year closer to death.

    Tuesday, 15-May-12 05:08:57 UTC from web in context
  15. @1pony4all Unless you're a fan of drinking, not much. :/

    Tuesday, 15-May-12 05:08:14 UTC from web in context
  16. @1pony4all Happy Birthday

    Tuesday, 15-May-12 01:53:36 UTC from web in context
  17. @1pony4all no probs bro ~

    Monday, 14-May-12 02:21:19 UTC from web in context
  18. @1pony4all well, you should listen to the doctor. I classmate of mine took more meds than he should and got diabetes

    Monday, 14-May-12 02:16:52 UTC from web in context
  19. @1pony4all well, these days happens

    Monday, 14-May-12 02:13:29 UTC from web in context
  20. @1pony4all But the monitor worked fine _before_ this, right? ...I'm confused. Sorry I couldn't be of more assistance.

    Sunday, 13-May-12 05:06:12 UTC from IdentiCurse in context
  21. @1pony4all Well, a monitor should be used with the highest resolution it supports to avoid blurring, I know that much. You might have to adjust the color settings and such on your monitor. I'm not too sure on the specifics though, since my experience with LCD monitors is honestly pretty limited.

    Sunday, 13-May-12 05:03:15 UTC from IdentiCurse in context
  22. @1pony4all ...Hm. Does your monitor support 1920x1080, by chance? I'm not sure at this point if the problem is an upscaled resolution or if there's actually a problem with your graphics card, considering how you say the colors are also off.

    Sunday, 13-May-12 04:56:15 UTC from IdentiCurse in context
  23. @1pony4all At 1600x900, or just at 1366x768?

    Sunday, 13-May-12 04:51:20 UTC from IdentiCurse in context
  24. @1pony4all No, you're just hitting a bottleneck somewhere along the line. Just use the HDMI cable, bud, it'll be fine.

    Sunday, 13-May-12 04:46:32 UTC from IdentiCurse in context
  25. @1pony4all My TV does that too. It only goes to 1366x768 through VGA, but HDMI goes all the way to 1920x1080. I'm assuming it's a limitation in the VGA standard, but I'm not sure.

    Sunday, 13-May-12 04:43:28 UTC from IdentiCurse in context
  26. @1pony4all I hope @redenchilada can help you more

    Sunday, 13-May-12 04:38:44 UTC from web in context
  27. @1pony4all Wouldn't that mean your monitor's native resolution is 1600x900? If you're running a lower resolution than your monitor supports, if it's an LCD you'll get that blurring. It's because lower resolutions are upscaled, as LCDs cannot physically adjust their display resolution. No clue why it wasn't doing that before, though.

    Sunday, 13-May-12 04:36:43 UTC from web in context
  28. @1pony4all Hmm interesting, I never recall it being what I would say noodly towards VGA. I am at a loss for troubleshooting friend. I wish I could be more of help. I would have to be there actually messing with the cables

    Sunday, 13-May-12 04:36:38 UTC from web in context
  29. @1pony4all Hmm I never had a problem with Westinghouse actually. Although I have heard that some cards do not like Westinghouse monitors. How old is it?

    Sunday, 13-May-12 04:32:58 UTC from web in context
  30. @1pony4all I have that same problem with my other TV. Sometimes it is the manufacturer. Is it a Phillips?

    Sunday, 13-May-12 04:30:45 UTC from web in context