Conversation

Notices

  1. Macpony55 Macpony55

    So is Anonymous good or bad? Good: http://arstechnica.com/business/news/2011/10/anonymous-takes-down-darknet-child-porn-site-on-tor-network.ars Bad: http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/02/how-one-security-firm-tracked-anonymousand-paid-a-heavy-price.ars

    Monday, 16-Jan-12 23:22:51 UTC from web
    1. Insert FakeNameHere Insert FakeNameHere

      @macpony55 Anonymous is good... they only target the people who have it coming... like for example when Sony tried George Hotz for jailbreaking the PS3 even though that was totally allowed by US law, Anonymous hit Sony where it hurt: their wallets

      Monday, 16-Jan-12 23:24:48 UTC from web
      1. Macpony55 Macpony55

        @the20percent Ok cool, it's just their methods that have the FBI after them XD

        Monday, 16-Jan-12 23:26:08 UTC from web
        1. Insert FakeNameHere Insert FakeNameHere

          @macpony55 well, considering that corporations and government are one in the same, I wouldn't be surprised... and btw: you can only arrest individual anonymous members, and there is no leadership. Anybody can claim to be anonymous, and thus be anonymous. They don't have to be hackers, just follow a sense of right and wrong, however they choose.

          Monday, 16-Jan-12 23:29:30 UTC from web
    2. Michael Michael

      @macpony55 I see them as neutral or i suppose working on a z axis instead of the good/bad x axis we look at. They're not seeing who's good or bad, just attacking those they deem necessary. I suppose something similar to a batman mixed with joker aspect.

      Monday, 16-Jan-12 23:30:49 UTC from web
      1. Macpony55 Macpony55

        @pumpkinhill I like that analysis

        Monday, 16-Jan-12 23:33:32 UTC from web