Conversation

Notices

  1. Seriously. !sabayon deserves more attention. It's like the spawn of !Arch and !Debian. Easy to install, yet, rolling, powerful and fast.

    Wednesday, 11-Apr-12 19:33:00 UTC from identi.ca at 42°0'0"N 21°25'59"E
    1. @dekomote I thought sabayon was based off of gentoo, not arch

      Thursday, 12-Apr-12 04:23:22 UTC from identi.ca
    2. @dekomote And had the most "EXTREME CRASH" I have ever experienced on any computer system. Tried it a few months ago, just installed the updates and it broke completely. Personally, I consider Windows to be more stable than Sabayon, though perhaps I just had bad luck.

      Thursday, 12-Apr-12 06:23:53 UTC from Choqok
      1. Hah,I had that luck with Arch on few occasions. Just few weeks back, the system wouldn't boot after an upgrade. It even froze the whole sys.

        Thursday, 12-Apr-12 06:45:00 UTC from identi.ca at 42°0'0"N 21°25'59"E
      2. Turns out,there was a slight regression in the kernel with ASPM,and that you need to force it in order to boot. Rolling distros do that.

        Thursday, 12-Apr-12 06:46:51 UTC from identi.ca at 42°0'0"N 21°25'59"E
    3. Yup. But with the package manager and the rolling nature, feels like Arch, and with the ease of installation feels like Debian.

      Thursday, 12-Apr-12 06:23:50 UTC from identi.ca at 42°0'0"N 21°25'59"E
    4. I came from # > # > !ArchLinux That was before good # binary packs & Spins http://ur1.ca/8zp8o Still I wouldnt go back

      Thursday, 12-Apr-12 21:15:17 UTC from identi.ca at 4°36'34"N 74°4'54"W