Conversation

Notices

  1. NoSense NoSense

    If a person were to go to the future they would not see themselves in the future because they jumped time, and they never did anything thus continuing action after that time gap - Self Future Absence Theory

    Monday, 26-May-14 23:53:13 UTC from web
    1. scoot scoot

      @thisisntgonnabegood That is assuming they didn't go back to their own timeline after they went to the future to look around.

      Monday, 26-May-14 23:54:18 UTC from web
      1. NoSense NoSense

        @scoot Of course

        Monday, 26-May-14 23:55:11 UTC from web
        1. scoot scoot

          @thisisntgonnabegood Well then of course they don't find themselves, they basically just disappeared for X amount of years.

          Monday, 26-May-14 23:56:17 UTC from web
      2. NoSense NoSense

        @scoot This is just a thought I had after thinking about Back to the Future

        Monday, 26-May-14 23:57:05 UTC from web
        1. scoot scoot

          @thisisntgonnabegood Yeah but the thing is there's no way it could work differently, your theory is pretty much already the only theory on how that work

          Monday, 26-May-14 23:59:17 UTC from web
          1. NoSense NoSense

            @scoot What baffles me the most is how someone goes back without messing the timeline up without a default button or alike because a nanosecond off and there's two (or more depending on how bad it went) of you.

            Tuesday, 27-May-14 00:04:39 UTC from web
            1. scoot scoot

              @thisisntgonnabegood It's completely unknown if two of the same person in one place would even cause an issue, it might be absolutely fine. Also I assume an actual time machine would be able to do a return journey and be clever about it, if that technology were to exist.

              Tuesday, 27-May-14 00:06:42 UTC from web
              1. NoSense NoSense

                @scoot my assumption is considering that it doesn't.

                Tuesday, 27-May-14 00:23:01 UTC from web