Conversation
Notices
-
>No one saw previous post >lurkmode success.
Thursday, 21-Jun-12 14:43:14 UTC from web-
@wiipon3 I saw it - and I disagree on it.
Thursday, 21-Jun-12 14:44:50 UTC from web-
@hakupony give it about...*guesstimating* 3months. then say that again.
Thursday, 21-Jun-12 14:47:40 UTC from web-
@wiipon3 I prefer to look back on thousands of years of human history and on how people develop normally. We are no corrupted pure creatures - not individually and not as a species. By developing self conscience, we have the possibility to develop meanings for all there is. This also means we gain the power to love and to hate - in all it's numerous faces. There is no "right" or "wrong", no "success" or "failure" outside of our own perception. What the world is for me is nothing but my own creation - and this creation does not need a god.
Thursday, 21-Jun-12 14:57:55 UTC from web-
@hakupony sorry if I used "god help you". Guess it’s just me hoping to reach out and see if maybe there would be at least something to hold onto outside of the void of "chaos" that you had described to me before. Sadly I understand that it’s both impossible to "unite" under one moniker and under one purpose, because we as a species and most sentient beings cannot succumb to the monotony of such a thing, yet at the same time by not uniting it leads to the overall encompassing conflict that while keeps things from being that monotonous and overly simplified and “boring” life…It in no way truly makes it any better, The forces of Yin vs. yang. Good vs. evil, ever constant….it both drives us and yet is the bane of our existence. Pity no other alternative can ever exist.
Thursday, 21-Jun-12 15:05:19 UTC from web-
@wiipon3 I don't approve of duality. Forget "good" and "evil" - if you think in that way, your desires and values usually are good while those who do not match yours are "evil". This is the source of hatred. To master the art of cooexistance, you have to go above good and evil and find a way which allows you to cooexist, ways to solve conflicts without violence. It is good that we don't all have the same opinions and goals - then, even this site here would be incredible boring. I am talking here about a moralic stance which does not require you to obey the rools and be a "good boy" - I am talking about perfecting the art to be above your self and deal with differences.
Thursday, 21-Jun-12 15:13:19 UTC from web-
@hakupony Chaotic good...no constraints...no rules really...other than to interpret and understand in a context of unbiased prejudice and to not label such things..for me i know of that...i prefer to only keep the labels for simplicity sake..but i know that as a friend once told me and as you have said in support of it, "brilliance has no bias". In this sense, no bias is needed in the perception of the realities that we must experience. Only interpretations.
Thursday, 21-Jun-12 15:16:40 UTC from web-
@wiipon3 I would say I do follow some rules but I follow those out of sheer pragmatism or because I need to use the world which appears to have a certain structure. My idea is pretty much based on the same things as Nietzsches concept of Übermensch. Normal humans follow a certain code of morale - which works because these codes structure society. But, by being "good" people they are nothing but a tool of a system which may be malicious - like the 3rd Reich. What I want to achieve is to make the world a better place by contributing something of my own. I intend to create a way of thinking which helps people to contribute something of their own to make that mashine that is society better.
Thursday, 21-Jun-12 15:29:20 UTC from web-
@hakupony Your crazy for trying that....just like me, for wanting that and trying it also. If you succeed before i do or if you and i can work together somehow someday, then i hope it will be something worthwhile. Good luck my friend..i have a project (well like 3) to finish.
Thursday, 21-Jun-12 15:32:22 UTC from web-
@wiipon3 Cracy? Not one bit. Society is fueled by knowledge, all power just works because of knowledge. The problems I want to approach are those of philosophy. One of those problems is that many fail to see the significance of certain philosophical knowledge. The other is that most people just don't understand it at all. This is where education kicks in - I still don't have a real concept but if you can teach a way to understand other people, reflect on why things turned out as they did and that people do wrong things for "good" reasons, I believe that there is hope for a better future. I also believe that the whole process has already started in our culture.
Thursday, 21-Jun-12 15:51:10 UTC from web-
@hakupony The value of philosophical knowledge cannot be teached.
Thursday, 21-Jun-12 15:52:27 UTC from web-
@nerthos I am not talking about the kind of teaching you do in school. There are other ways to teach - you can teach somepony by giving them the task to organize something - and with every advice or comment you give, you can educate without teaching.
Thursday, 21-Jun-12 15:57:05 UTC from web-
@hakupony The effort to make that a reality is too big. At least in my opinion, it's better that those who want to know learn, and those who don't just be used as cheap workers.
Thursday, 21-Jun-12 16:00:00 UTC from web-
@nerthos There is nothing more dangerous as an idiot who thinks to fight against "evil".
Thursday, 21-Jun-12 16:01:08 UTC from web-
@hakupony And your point?
Thursday, 21-Jun-12 16:01:35 UTC from web
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
