Conversation

Notices

  1. @comradeconventrix You really want to believe in a theory? A theory that 65% of non Christian scholars are dismissing as false. And I forgot to mention those non Christian scholars don't have a

    Sunday, 01-Jul-12 02:58:22 UTC from web
    1. @comradeconventrix Theaton level dude, don't forget to mention the Bowing aircrafts.

      Sunday, 01-Jul-12 03:02:11 UTC from StatusNet Android
    2. @comradeconventrix http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xWji92N8RM&feature=youtube_gdata_player

      Sunday, 01-Jul-12 03:05:46 UTC from StatusNet Android
    3. @cuddlemonster Please brush up on basic scientific terminology before starting on that "only a theory" tack: a hypothesis is a proposed idea as to how something works, a theory is one which correlates with a strong body of supporting evidence, and a law is something which can be absolutely proven. Yes, evolution is a theory, but you're interpreting the term differently to the scientific sense. And as for the "65% think it's false" number, I would _love_ to see your proof for that. (Also, Christianity is not fundamentally at odds with the idea that evolution happens, unless you wish to believe in a literal 7 day creation; an awful lot of Christians don't, and take it more as a metaphor for how much God guided the process of life.)

      Sunday, 01-Jul-12 03:06:23 UTC from web
      1. @bitshift talk to me when you know how how carbon-14 dating works or radio metric dating works

        Sunday, 01-Jul-12 03:09:10 UTC from web
        1. @cuddlemonster I'm not sure what you're trying to say with that, but I do actually know how both of those work (both are based on extrapolating from the undecayed quantities present of various elements with known half-lives, the biggest difference between the two being which element is considered).

          Sunday, 01-Jul-12 03:13:08 UTC from web