Conversation

Notices

  1. Why would you charge just as much for a digital copy than you do for a physical one? there's no point in buying digital then.

    Friday, 03-Mar-17 11:37:00 UTC from web
    1. @nerthos Because your publisher requires price parity, usually.

      Friday, 03-Mar-17 11:40:20 UTC from community.highlandarrow.com
    2. @nerthos https://social.heldscal.la/attachment/275108 https://social.heldscal.la/attachment/275109

      Friday, 03-Mar-17 11:42:26 UTC from social.heldscal.la
      1. @lambadalambda Hahaha, ok this is too much

        Friday, 03-Mar-17 11:41:34 UTC from web
    3. @nerthos shelf space? "you can't grep dead trees"?

      Friday, 03-Mar-17 12:34:07 UTC from quitter.se
      1. @bsmall2 I guess there's that, but it's still not worth it to pay as much for a digital copy as you would for a physical one.

        Friday, 03-Mar-17 13:55:39 UTC from web
        1. @nerthos @bsmall2 you're not paying for the copy. You're paying for the human who wrote the original. Isn't that the whole point?

          Friday, 03-Mar-17 14:23:12 UTC from quitter.se
          1. @strypey @nerthos @bsmall2 that's the point and you still pay humans in both cases but the price should be able to still differ

            Friday, 03-Mar-17 14:51:33 UTC from quitter.se
          2. @strypey @nerthos @bsmall2 that's the point and you still pay humans in both cases but the price should still be able to differ

            Friday, 03-Mar-17 14:52:20 UTC from quitter.se
            1. @goldbrush @nerthos @strypey @bsmall2 You're also paying the ppl who physically printed and distributed, that makes print more expensive

              Friday, 03-Mar-17 15:26:21 UTC from quitter.se
              1. @jcaktiv @nerthos @goldbrush @bsmall2 true, but beside the point. Books still cost more to buy than they cost to produce, usually a lot more

                Friday, 03-Mar-17 15:28:25 UTC from quitter.se
                1. @nerthos @goldbrush @jcaktiv @bsmall2 perhaps the author is charging more for the digital version so they can charge less for the print one?

                  Friday, 03-Mar-17 15:29:10 UTC from quitter.se
                  1. @strypey @nerthos @goldbrush @bsmall2 Perhaps publishing houses charge as much as they get away with?

                    Friday, 03-Mar-17 15:35:51 UTC from quitter.se
                    1. @jcaktiv @nerthos @goldbrush @bsmall2 I imagine they usually charge as much as "the market will bear", but this case could be different

                      Friday, 03-Mar-17 23:38:36 UTC from quitter.se
                      1. @strypey @nerthos @jcaktiv @bsmall2 that is actual a good point. Price is set mostly by what people are ready to pay (in some cases)

                        Saturday, 04-Mar-17 00:01:15 UTC from quitter.se
                        1. @goldbrush @nerthos @strypey @jcaktiv We'd accept pricing if we knew the producers were getting what they need, w/out killing anything.

                          Saturday, 04-Mar-17 01:00:45 UTC from quitter.se
                        2. @goldbrush @nerthos @strypey @jcaktiv Have you taken a look at ParEcon? It's a good way to think about the economy.  http://qttr.at/1pq2

                          Saturday, 04-Mar-17 02:37:16 UTC from quitter.se
                          1. @bsmall2 @nerthos @goldbrush @jcaktiv PareCon is a fascinating thought experiment but has very little to do with trying to make a living now

                            Saturday, 04-Mar-17 05:04:12 UTC from quitter.se
                            1. @nerthos @goldbrush @jcaktiv @bsmall2 there's a website on PareCon here, not sure if Michael Albert is still active
                              http://qttr.at/1pq3

                              Saturday, 04-Mar-17 05:32:40 UTC from quitter.se
                              1. @strypey @nerthos @goldbrush @jcaktiv I don't know if Michael Albert is doing this site, but he's doing Znet (Zcomm) and other initiatives

                                Saturday, 04-Mar-17 06:22:11 UTC from quitter.se
                              2. @nerthos @goldbrush @jcaktiv @bsmall2 LibCom have had some long, fairly circular debates about pros and cons of PareCon
                                http://qttr.at/1pq4

                                Saturday, 04-Mar-17 06:30:44 UTC from quitter.se
                                1. @strypey @nerthos @goldbrush @jcaktiv Reading it helped me think about the economy. Rev'n in Welfare Economics (parts I understood) was good

                                  Saturday, 04-Mar-17 06:31:51 UTC from quitter.se
                                2. @strypey @nerthos @goldbrush @jcaktiv The ideas: balance job complex and coordinator class stuck with me, It should help think about pricing

                                  Saturday, 04-Mar-17 06:36:11 UTC from quitter.se
                              3. @strypey @nerthos @goldbrush @jcaktiv Michael Albert's new initiative: http://qttr.at/1pq6

                                Saturday, 04-Mar-17 06:32:24 UTC from quitter.se
                              4. @strypey @nerthos @goldbrush @jcaktiv Z is back! ".. all owe elements of their personalities to the jobs they do." Ch 1. http://qttr.at/1prk

                                Sunday, 05-Mar-17 06:05:37 UTC from quitter.se
                              5. @strypey @nerthos @goldbrush @jcaktiv A Recent Michael Albert initiative: http://qttr.at/1prl

                                Sunday, 05-Mar-17 06:07:02 UTC from quitter.se
                                1. @bsmall2 I admire the intent, but isn't there a risk of doing the regime's work for them by creating a convenient public list of dissidents?

                                  Sunday, 05-Mar-17 13:38:42 UTC from quitter.se
                            2. @strypey @nerthos @goldbrush @jcaktiv I think the idea of balanced job complexes is important when starting an organization.

                              Saturday, 04-Mar-17 06:19:26 UTC from quitter.se
                            3. @strypey @nerthos @goldbrush @jcaktiv Not that I've started an organization yet, but if I do I hope to use ParEcon principles.

                              Saturday, 04-Mar-17 06:20:17 UTC from quitter.se
                        3. @goldbrush @nerthos @strypey @jcaktiv The Zcomm site seems to be down now but I like the book, Looking Forward, that is on-line there.

                          Saturday, 04-Mar-17 02:39:25 UTC from quitter.se
                        4. @goldbrush @nerthos @jcaktiv @bsmall2 specifically the highest price that doesn't put enough people off to lower overall $ in sales

                          Saturday, 04-Mar-17 05:02:23 UTC from quitter.se
          3. @strypey A digital copy has no cost of production, so paying the same amount to the author would mean the digital copy would be cheaper. If they cost the same, the only reasonable option in normal circumstances is to buy the physical copy to make the most of your money.

            Friday, 03-Mar-17 21:42:38 UTC from web
            1. @nerthos like @bsmall2 says, that's depends entirely on whether you *want* the physical copy, or whether you just want to support the author

              Friday, 03-Mar-17 23:36:23 UTC from quitter.se