Conversation

Notices

  1. Dominic Fandrey Dominic Fandrey

    I'm marking not safe for children content with # and use the rot13 feature on it. Is that allowed? Is there a propper way to do it, like a # tag?

    Wednesday, 12-Dec-12 20:29:59 UTC from web
    1. Cerulean Lulamoon-Spark Cerulean Lulamoon-Spark

      @kamikaze That's fine. Better than average, even.

      Wednesday, 12-Dec-12 20:31:33 UTC from web
    2. RedEnchilada (notice the lack of a space) RedEnchilada (notice the lack of a space)

      @kamikaze the NSFW tag is pretty much the catch-all "you wouldn't want your little sister seeing this" marker. So it's perfectly ok.

      Wednesday, 12-Dec-12 20:32:16 UTC from web
      1. Dominic Fandrey Dominic Fandrey

        @redenchilada @ceruleanspark Thanks. BTW, I like how my question exploded into this huge thing.

        Wednesday, 12-Dec-12 20:41:41 UTC from web
        1. RedEnchilada (notice the lack of a space) RedEnchilada (notice the lack of a space)

          @kamikaze /shrug

          Wednesday, 12-Dec-12 20:42:57 UTC from StatusNet Android
      2. Toksyuryel Toksyuryel

        @redenchilada I was under the impression that it was only for links to external content.

        Wednesday, 12-Dec-12 20:42:20 UTC from web
        1. RedEnchilada (notice the lack of a space) RedEnchilada (notice the lack of a space)

          @toksyuryel It's been used primarily for that, but if people wish to use it for other things such as what kamikaze is saying, I don't wanna discourage that.

          Wednesday, 12-Dec-12 20:44:09 UTC from StatusNet Android
    3. - -

      @kamikaze Goddamit I've done that on occasion, Rot13'd it AND put a NSFW tag on it, and just because it was something that I dunno... had bare human boobs on the other end, it wasnt allowed, there needs to do this on a chalkboard, Doc Brown back to the future style to define these bloody rules

      Wednesday, 12-Dec-12 20:34:23 UTC from web
      1. RedEnchilada (notice the lack of a space) RedEnchilada (notice the lack of a space)

        @purplephish20 Well /that's/ still against the rules. A casual mention of it isn't, but barechested ladies are against the rules. Think of something like The Simpsons; if they wouldn't get away with it there, you can't get away with it here.

        Wednesday, 12-Dec-12 20:36:12 UTC from web
        1. - -

          @redenchilada they got away with barts bare knob in the movie

          Wednesday, 12-Dec-12 20:36:54 UTC from web
          1. Cerulean Lulamoon-Spark Cerulean Lulamoon-Spark

            @purplephish20 For real? People have /entirely seriously/ gone to prison for that exact highly specific thing.

            Wednesday, 12-Dec-12 20:37:50 UTC from web
            1. - -

              @ceruleanspark Errr... yeah, look it up. When I saw it the cinema erupted in stupid laughter.... why the hell did I go and see that terrible movie

              Wednesday, 12-Dec-12 20:39:15 UTC from web
              1. Cerulean Lulamoon-Spark Cerulean Lulamoon-Spark

                @purplephish20 http://jonathanturley.org/2010/01/27/doh-man-arrested-for-possession-of-pornographic-images-of-marge-simpson/

                Wednesday, 12-Dec-12 20:39:55 UTC from web
                1. - -

                  @ceruleanspark Seen that, Lol'd

                  Wednesday, 12-Dec-12 20:40:59 UTC from web
        2. colfax colfax

          @redenchilada Do you think rule lawyering should be considered harassment?

          Wednesday, 12-Dec-12 20:38:08 UTC from web
          1. RedEnchilada (notice the lack of a space) RedEnchilada (notice the lack of a space)

            @colfax If they're sincerely mistaken, no. If they're badgering us just to argue a rule, yes.

            Wednesday, 12-Dec-12 20:40:14 UTC from StatusNet Android
      2. RDN's Lucifer RDN's Lucifer

        @purplephish20 That falls into the "Don't link pornographic material directly" rule.

        Wednesday, 12-Dec-12 20:36:22 UTC from web