Conversation

Notices

  1. The Cabal has arrived.

    Monday, 04-Apr-11 23:23:56 UTC from web
    1. @greydragon412 wait, we don't have a Group!?

      Tuesday, 05-Jul-11 20:30:34 UTC from web
      1. @princegentlegiant wait, never mind I found it.

        Tuesday, 05-Jul-11 20:31:33 UTC from web
    2. @greydragon412 !LunarRep Because I messed up and for some reason there is another group with that name. Need a mod/admin to remove it. :/ Pony till ya drop! Or Make a fanfic. Idk.

      Tuesday, 05-Jul-11 20:32:12 UTC from web
    3. @greydragon412 Blame my browser for messing up. http://ur1.ca/4n4x3

      Tuesday, 05-Jul-11 20:33:49 UTC from web
    4. @greydragon412 Yeah. We could

      Tuesday, 05-Jul-11 20:34:33 UTC from web
    5. @greydragon412 I'll happily remove any group if I am asked to do so by the pony who owns/controls it.

      Tuesday, 05-Jul-11 20:34:43 UTC from web
      1. @purpletinker I used to own it, made that extra group by accident. Could you please remove it? Thanks.

        Tuesday, 05-Jul-11 20:36:24 UTC from web
        1. @emperormiloth Who currently controls the group?

          Tuesday, 05-Jul-11 20:44:42 UTC from web
          1. @purpletinker Nobody.

            Tuesday, 05-Jul-11 20:47:22 UTC from web
            1. @emperormiloth Okay, for some reason the system let somepony create a group with no nickname. Nuking it now.

              Tuesday, 05-Jul-11 20:53:11 UTC from web
              1. @purpletinker Yeah, I've noticed that it lets groups be created without a name. There's no way to access the page though - which I find interesting. [There are a number of them among the pages of groups that exist]

                Tuesday, 05-Jul-11 20:54:59 UTC from web
                1. @haganbmj I've added a bugfix for the 'users can create groups with no nickname' issue to our todo/wishlist file. Thanks!

                  Tuesday, 05-Jul-11 20:57:17 UTC from web
                  1. @purpletinker Haha, awesome :D ~ I just think it's interesting that the name isn't a required field o.o

                    Tuesday, 05-Jul-11 20:58:12 UTC from web
                    1. @haganbmj Yeah. It's pretty clearly a bug.

                      Tuesday, 05-Jul-11 20:59:07 UTC from web
                      1. @purpletinker I just scanned through the group pages and there's actually fewer no-names than I thought. Just a few on pages 4 and 5. I was under the impression that there were more.

                        Tuesday, 05-Jul-11 21:00:44 UTC from web
              2. @purpletinker I think theres a hand full of groups like that.

                Tuesday, 05-Jul-11 20:57:30 UTC from web
                1. @emperormiloth Eeyup. And once we institute a permanent fix to this issue, they should all probably get nuked....

                  Tuesday, 05-Jul-11 20:58:16 UTC from web
                  1. @purpletinker ok, and thanks!

                    Tuesday, 05-Jul-11 20:59:02 UTC from web
    6. @greydragon412 @emperormiloth Okay, I think I nuked the bad group. Try again now?

      Tuesday, 05-Jul-11 20:57:39 UTC from web
    7. @greydragon412 the !lunarrepublic shall grow strong!

      Tuesday, 05-Jul-11 21:00:06 UTC from web
    8. @greydragon412 Two r's. Like your speaking in spanish while rolling your tongue. Which I can't do for some reason.

      Tuesday, 05-Jul-11 21:02:18 UTC from web
    9. @greydragon412 No problem!

      Tuesday, 05-Jul-11 21:03:22 UTC from web