Conversation
Notices
-
A question for anyone who's had to deal with web hosting: if I want a small site for personal use (so nothing too huge), is a service that gives me around 300k estimated page views per month worth ~$30 for a year?
Friday, 14-Jun-13 23:31:17 UTC from web-
@redenchilada If all you actually want is the webhosting part, that's probably fine. Who's the provider?
Friday, 14-Jun-13 23:35:21 UTC from web -
@redenchilada That said if you have an amazon account you get a year on their free tier, which nets you 160gb of transfer a month, which is probably enough for a small project.
Friday, 14-Jun-13 23:36:26 UTC from web-
@ceruleanspark That's what @welcomepony was running on, right?
Friday, 14-Jun-13 23:39:14 UTC from web-
Friday, 14-Jun-13 23:40:33 UTC from web
-
@redenchilada Then yes. They both ran on the same server.
Friday, 14-Jun-13 23:47:12 UTC from web
-
-
@nerthos Probably?
Friday, 14-Jun-13 23:40:49 UTC from web
-
-
@ceruleanspark I'll look into that, then.
Friday, 14-Jun-13 23:40:01 UTC from web-
@redenchilada If you don't like that, there's also PremiumVM and DigitalOcean. They're more performant, but cost slightly more than your quoted price.
Friday, 14-Jun-13 23:41:38 UTC from web-
@ceruleanspark Well, $30 for a year is by no means my limit. I just don't want to spend more and get less. I'll look into those then, thanks.
Friday, 14-Jun-13 23:43:44 UTC from web-
@redenchilada I really like DigitalOcean, and nothing beats having your own real server. Shared hosting is for suckers.
Friday, 14-Jun-13 23:45:14 UTC from web-
@ceruleanspark It certainly looks like a good deal.
Friday, 14-Jun-13 23:49:59 UTC from web
-
-
-
@ceruleanspark I spent a day setting up and then molesting a 3 part SQL cluster on DigitalOceans hardware and it cost me all of 20 cents to keep 3 servers unning for a day.
Friday, 14-Jun-13 23:44:15 UTC from web
-
-
-
-