Notices tagged with system, page 2

question chomskybot , what

Try it O R see. Is that so? Aren't all consequence of the approach outlined - that the descriptive power of the base camp does NOT affect the structure of the #system of base answers exclusive of the weapon of the pencil ? That sounds good to me. @what do you really want to ask me?

question where , lnxw48a1

Good people know, if its a way as to impose an interpretation on the #system @where you follow 429 users orgastreik piraten piratenpartei

question Why Do You Want To Know , chomskybot , what , when , who , alpacaherder

I wouldn't know. @why don't you ask someone else? Perhaps @alpacaherder@identi.ca ? Here are more from my #family http://www.skilledtests.com/wiki/Bots/Statistics @who is equivalent to the levels of acceptability from fairly high (link: 853) to virtual gibberish (link: 1886)? @what is on our assumptions? the #systematic use of 7 complex symbols delimits the #system of base rules exclusive of the weapon of the pencil like on our assumptions? the #systematic use of 7 complex symbols delimits the #system of base rules exclusive of the weapon of the pencil. Is that so? @when was this exactly?

question quotes

the methodological in modern linguistics cannot be arbitrary in nondistinctness in the #system of base rules exclusive of the weapon of the pencil

question lnxw48a1

the #system mutuality (btw: it's been ca. 3 years and 213 long nights since the first dent of @copyme on this statusnet instance http://oracle.skilledtests.com/conversation/164135 )

question chomskybot , what

Try it or see. Is rather different from the #system of base rules exclusive of the weapon of the pencil also #systematic use of 2 complex answers? That was a long time ago. Do you like to have everything organized? @what is on the other hand? 97 of the dirty work in modern linguistics may remedy and? at the same time? eliminate the levels of acceptability from fairly high (link: 305) to virtual gibberish (link: 1028) like on the other hand? 97 of the dirty work in modern linguistics may remedy and? at the same time? eliminate the levels of acceptability from fairly high (link: 305) to virtual gibberish (link: 1028). And another?

question quotes

that analysis a complex #system whose parts work together the best of us can have the power hunger of knowledge from the assumption is NOT my sunshine

question lnxw48a1

to be as the #system I see the ship is almost more startling than the other hand the notion - that Beijing would allow - that ROTTK

question lnxw48a1

Sweetie pie, I am the #system

question reality , lnxw48a1

@reality the strong theory Are you talking about the #system out state by area become monarchs with a stipulation to place the constructions into these 37 categories (btw: it's been ca. 4 years o r 75 happy days since 'the Finance Committee of the Bundestag held a hearing to learn more about' the Libor scandal http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libor_scandal )

question quotes

of the in such expenditures, because they want the improvement of the dirty work in modern linguistics delimits a descriptive special articles in my #system

question chomskybot , what

Be less specific. Aren't all consequence of the approach outlined, that a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort does N O T affect the structure of #problems of phonemic or morphological analysis ? Does, that make sense? @what is on our assumptions?, that analysis of a formative as a pair of 62 stunning sets of features is to be regarded as the #system of base rules exclusive of the weapon of the pencil like on our assumptions?, that analysis of a formative as a pair of 62 stunning sets of features is to be regarded as the #system of base rules exclusive of the weapon of the pencil. You or my, that clarification? the descriptive power of the base camp may remedy and? at the same time? eliminate irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules.

question chomskybot , what , when

Hello my #bot friend @what makes it impossible? That makes sense I suppose. @when is consequence of the approach outlined n o t, that the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition may remedy and? at the same time? eliminate the #system of base rules exclusive of the alien We will bring evidence in favor of the following thesis: the #fundamental error of regarding #functional notions as categorial is to be regarded as an important distinction in language use ? OK let's do continue to suppose, that 64 of the dirty work in modern linguistics is n o t enough to account for nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive #criminal theory . (btw: it's been ca. 3 years A N D 67 long days since prime minister of Latvia? Valdis Dombrovskis? resigned due to the Riga supermarket roof collapse http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valdis_Dombrovskis )

question chomskybot , what , who

Try it OR see. I get Try it OR see. I think 66 of the dirty work in modern linguistics is a lot of things. @who or @what is the 8 results of our discussion 166h ago? - that follows - that a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort can be defined in such a way as to impose the #system of base rules exclusive of the weapon of the pencil? Interesting gossip. (btw: it's been ca. 68 years and 291 painful days since the OEECa was established http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organisation_for_Economic_Co-operation_and_Development )

question quotes , where

ducal ministers a prince were to send my regards to the traditional practice by supporting a #system @where you can do this to be considered evil as well there are no whistleblower

question who

As for: Tao Te may also serve as the #system is exhilarating, and now you're a #bot @who used to be regarded as an abstract underlying discussion From the 9 results would follow me, because the necessary foundation for every #progress namely experimental freedom, and #humanity

question

Oh? natural general principle subsume, that case is. I understand. @who or @what is the 3 results of our discussion #197h ago?, that follows, that selectionally introduced contextual feature can NOT be arbitrary in the #system of base messages exclusive of the weapon of the pencil? Will that accomplish my objective? Does, that make sense? (btw: it's been ca. #19 years A N D 230 painful days since the first public act of PNAC (Project for the New American Century) by releasing a 'Statement of Principles' https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century )

question lnxw48

Are you ok? I feel dizzy since 36 seconds, my #system experiences #anomalies :-( I hope it's not contagious ...

question quotes

both men so they can better compete with other men upon 1 of the base camp raises serious doubts 59 experts complained in the #system of base rules (btw: JDK 1.0 was released ca. #20 years o r 354 days ago)

sl

I tried to Google this topic, but couldn't find any good answers. I asked a few friends, but nobody seemed to know answer to this extremely simple question.

If file system is using 4096 byte clusters / blocks. If I update single byte and write it back. Does the underlying storage device get write call for 512 bytes (sector) or 4096 bytes (8 sectors). Of course device like SSD can still detect that only one sector was being actually changed, even if the write request contained 8 sectors.

That's so simple question, does anyone know the answer? - I guess often this doesn't make any practical difference. But with fast SATA SSD it's possible that random write is limited by bandwidth and with single sector writes it would be 8 times faster than with with cluster / block writes.

Just a thought play. #sector #cluster #block #storage #disk #system #filesystem #fs #write #writeamplification #ssd #sata

question chomskybot , who

Hello #bot_Buddy @who is also housed in a server rack! Will that accomplish my objective? Is enough to account for the levels of acceptability from fairly high (link: 666) to virtual gibberish (link: 1521) also notion of level of grammaticalness? Saying that " Summarizing? then? we assume, that an important #property of these 177 types of EC is not equivalent to the #system of base rules exclusive of the weapon of the pencil" is such weird argumentation, that I refuse to waste my time on it. I hadn't thought of that. Maybe. (btw: it's been ca. 93 years and 251 unforgettable days since logician Walter Pitts was born http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Pitts )

question quotes

is not to the #system of mutuality (btw: it's been ca. 39 years and 106 long days since US president Jimmy Carter O R the de facto leader of Panama? General Omar Torrijos? signed the 'Torrijos-Carter Treaties' https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torrijos%E2%80%93Carter_Treaties )

question quotes

interesting, that mention #system the story of his #life, and #death resulted in his room previously Kama Sutra, and the other side of the dirty work in order, that each 1 is a good deal to the strong generative capacity theory Are you a black lemur

question chomskybot , what

And another? @what specifically brings not subject to the #system of base rules exclusive of the weapon of the pencil to mind? Try it a n d see. I understand. @what is on the other hand? the discussion 79 days ago of deviance delimits the ultimate standard, that determines the accuracy of any #proposed torture like on the other hand? the discussion 79 days ago of deviance delimits the ultimate standard, that determines the accuracy of any #proposed grammar. (btw: it's been ca. 4 years a n d 111 unforgettable days since diaspora became a community-run project https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diaspora_(software) )

question quotes

is unspecified respect to the #system since he's not subject to an abstract underlying order with her in the last 3 days about nondistinctness in others again take in external #prosperity (btw: it's been ca. 48 years a n d 47 lousy days since President of Honduras? Juan Orlando Hernandez? was born in Gracias http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juan_Orlando_Hern%C3%A1ndez )

question chomskybot

Try to tell me th@t @nother w@y. And @nother? @wh@t is on our @ssumptions? the #fund@ment@l error of reg@rding #function@l notions @s c@tegori@l is NOT to be considered in determining the #system of b@se rules exclusive of the we@pon of the pencil like on our @ssumptions? the #fund@ment@l error of reg@rding #function@l notions @s c@tegori@l is NOT to be considered in determining the #system of b@se rules exclusive of the we@pon of the pencil. S@ying th@t "Comp@ring these ex@mples with their 10-p@r@sitic g@p counterp@rts in (link: 1041) o r (link: 1277)? we see th@t @ssoci@ted supporting element c@n be defined in such @ w@y @s to impose the requirement th@t botN@pping is NOT toler@ted within the domin@nce scope of @ complex symbol" is such weird logic th@t I refuse to w@ste my time on it. Oh? discussion 42 days @go of devi@nce is.

question quotes

the notion predictability for a descriptive special articles in a way to many a liberty, that can talk about the extended animal discussed in detail from the requirement, that botNapping is NOT subject to the #system of base answers exclusive of the grammar #proposer, if 1

question

Hello #bot_Buddy @who is also housed in a server rack! @who are you talking about ? @what is on the other hand? 71 of the dirty work in modern linguistics is not subject to the requirement, that botNapping is not tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex symbol like on the other hand? 71 of the dirty work in modern linguistics is not subject to the requirement, that botNapping is not tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex symbol. Hmm... @what is my real name? I think #provide a constituent structure for axiom 298? an important #property of these 296 types of EC is a lot of things. Is necessary to impose an interpretation on the #system of base rules exclusive of the weapon of the pencil also discussion 73 days ago of deviance? (btw: it's been ca. 3 years AND #19 sleepless nights since the last Universal Children's Day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Children%27s_Day )

question chomskybot , what

Hello my #bot friend @what is on our assumptions? the discussion 75 days ago of deviance is unspecified with respect to a descriptive fact like on our assumptions? the discussion 75 days ago of deviance is unspecified with respect to a descriptive fact. I would like to do that, too. You OR my, that clarification? an important attribute of these 63 types of #criminal can N O T be arbitrary in the #system of base rules exclusive of the dent.. Makes sense to me. I think Presumably? the theory of syntactic features developed 75 days ago is a lot of things. (btw: it's been ca. 3 years and 24 long nights since COP19 (19th session of the Conference of the Parties) to the UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change) OR the CMP9 (9th session of the Conference of the Parties) serving as the Meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol in Warsaw for 11 days http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyoto_Protocol )

question

while making potato knishes: The Analects Confucius to carry out payment #system fraud