Replies to darkarchivist

  1. @darkarchivist I LOOOVOE you man. so much. you'll never know.

    Thursday, 08-Aug-13 07:11:10 UTC from web in context
  2. @darkarchivist I LOVE u man. I LOVE you.

    Thursday, 08-Aug-13 07:09:19 UTC from web in context
  3. @darkarchivist :-/

    Thursday, 08-Aug-13 07:07:18 UTC from web in context
  4. @darkarchivist doesn't matter if they have photos or not if you understand what I'm saying. Either way, pseudoscience is worth a witty remark accompanied with brief chortling, but must soon be dismissed. I cannot entertain the subject any further without coming off as unrefined.

    Thursday, 08-Aug-13 07:06:41 UTC from web in context
  5. @darkarchivist I mean, if the guys running it already were burdened with confirmation bias, there's no proof they did anything they claimed. It's possible they /didn't/ remove all the nerves but they said they did just to make it look spectacular

    Thursday, 08-Aug-13 07:04:07 UTC from web in context
  6. @darkarchivist *facepalm*

    Thursday, 08-Aug-13 07:01:01 UTC from web in context
  7. @darkarchivist The problem is, you can't prove god exists because the people who want to prove him believe in him and thus have no respect for the scientific method let alone any fathoming of its meaning. And you cannot disprove him in the same way I cannot disprove green aliens or the Easter Clause

    Thursday, 08-Aug-13 07:00:17 UTC from web in context
  8. @darkarchivist Nerves are neccesary to control all bodily functions. There's no way to remove them without slicing the body into hundreds of pieces.

    Thursday, 08-Aug-13 06:59:29 UTC from web in context
  9. @darkarchivist So I suppose it was supposed to prove something

    Thursday, 08-Aug-13 06:57:46 UTC from web in context
  10. @darkarchivist Without nerves you die

    Thursday, 08-Aug-13 06:56:01 UTC from web in context
  11. @darkarchivist lolwut?

    Thursday, 08-Aug-13 06:55:05 UTC from web in context
  12. @darkarchivist Well then you'll enjoy it!

    Thursday, 08-Aug-13 06:42:56 UTC from web in context
  13. @darkarchivist I'll cut ya

    Thursday, 08-Aug-13 06:41:05 UTC from web in context
  14. @darkarchivist There's the door you nubmnuts

    Thursday, 08-Aug-13 06:40:02 UTC from web in context
  15. @darkarchivist And im just saying i respect your/my opinion

    Thursday, 08-Aug-13 06:38:50 UTC from web in context
  16. @darkarchivist Get out

    Thursday, 08-Aug-13 06:38:01 UTC from web in context
  17. @darkarchivist you suck! >:( mustaches are awesome!

    Thursday, 08-Aug-13 06:37:28 UTC from web in context
  18. @darkarchivist and you knew this fully so why are you acting like he spelt it wrong? Honestly. It's correct either way.

    Thursday, 08-Aug-13 06:24:53 UTC from web in context
  19. @darkarchivist semantics plural of se·man·tics (Noun) Noun The branch of linguistics and logic concerned with meaning. The meaning of a word, phrase, sentence, or text: "such quibbling over semantics may seem petty stuff". Synonyms semasiology

    Thursday, 08-Aug-13 06:23:51 UTC from web in context
  20. @darkarchivist http://ur1.ca/ey8jg

    Thursday, 08-Aug-13 06:23:19 UTC from web in context
  21. @darkarchivist I'm staying -100ever

    Sunday, 28-Jul-13 12:42:11 UTC from web in context
  22. @darkarchivist alrighty then.

    Sunday, 28-Jul-13 03:58:39 UTC from web in context
  23. @darkarchivist merr?

    Sunday, 28-Jul-13 03:57:32 UTC from web in context
  24. @darkarchivist 'ello.

    Sunday, 28-Jul-13 03:57:07 UTC from web in context
  25. @darkarchivist see ya

    Saturday, 27-Jul-13 17:14:01 UTC from web in context
  26. @darkarchivist bye

    Saturday, 27-Jul-13 17:13:13 UTC from web in context
  27. @darkarchivist bye

    Saturday, 27-Jul-13 17:12:52 UTC from web in context
  28. @darkarchivist idk

    Saturday, 27-Jul-13 17:12:11 UTC from web in context
  29. @darkarchivist u alright?

    Saturday, 27-Jul-13 17:11:19 UTC from web in context
  30. @darkarchivist slightly, yes.

    Saturday, 27-Jul-13 16:59:07 UTC from web in context